Teams

SGV CA Rolling Hitters-Shimizu-WN/SU10

2022 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-04vs SGV Dynamic Duos -Chow-WN/SU8Split 11
W#2 DoublesMiki Makiko Shimizu / Serena Tseng vs Josephine Chow / Tanya Robinson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Chang / Kathleen Janisch vs Ade Quingco / Jane Caldito6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmber Nuuvali / Pei Fu vs Rieko Gambrel / Andrea Fruits6-2, 6-1
2022-11-06vs SGV Dynamic Duos -Chow-WN/SU8Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAmber Nuuvali / Pei Fu vs Regina Gov / Sandy Weyant5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2022-10-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJessie Zhang / Pei Fu vs Sonia Cassatt / Katrina Leong4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmber Nuuvali / Serena Tseng vs VICKY TRINH / Jennifer Lee3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmber Nuuvali / Kathleen Janisch vs Susan Yu / Joanne Kim2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 DoublesEn En Liao / Kathleen Janisch vs Emily Taylor / Deborah Babineau5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAmber Nuuvali / Serena Tseng vs Gloria Cardoza / Pin Hong6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Rachel Brereton
published
3.61
Serena Tseng
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Christina Burghard
published 3.5
3.20
Pei Fu
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Kathleen Janisch
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Claire Gibbs
published 3.5
3.10
Miki Makiko Shimizu
published
2.97
En En Liao
published 3.5
Jessie Zhang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Janisch + Pei Fu10358% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Brereton
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Serena Tseng
54W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Christina Burghard
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Pei Fu
85W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.20
3.5
Kathleen Janisch
60W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Claire Gibbs
6W–14L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Miki Makiko Shimizu
20W–32L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
En En Liao
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
2.97
Jessie Zhang
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.