Teams

BRMST NAVY

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-12vs RMTC GREENLost 02
L#1 SinglesMichele Gosselin vs Monica Blanco1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMorgan Arvisais / Jane Davis vs Heather Smith / Cara Hoving3-6, 2-1
2024-09-03vs NJ GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesSamantha Sutphin / Kim Graves vs Erica Moser / Brittany Guidetti6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesHillary Riley / Michele Gosselin vs Adrienne Tosto / Renee French6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-08-27vs NJ PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesSamantha Sutphin / Morgan Arvisais vs Kim Melvin / Sandra Galvan6-2, 6-1
2024-08-19vs LTA-Q SILVERSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSamantha Sutphin / Kim Graves vs Hilary Hartwig / Catherine Romero6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesHillary Riley vs Jill Mendoza4-6, 0-6
2024-08-06vs BCC NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesYayoi Shaw / Morgan Arvisais vs Becky Fase / Regan Ebert7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSamantha Sutphin vs Victoria McCarthy6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichele Gosselin / Kim Graves vs Kathy Caruso / Michelle Gallop6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2024-07-30vs NJ GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesHillary Riley / Jane Davis vs Casey Rhine / Renee French7-6, 6-0
2024-07-23vs NJ PURPLEWon 20
W#1 DoublesSamantha Sutphin / Meghan Vogel vs Heidi Warriner / Kim Melvin6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHillary Riley / Morgan Arvisais vs Jennifer Ashley / Dayna Ashley-Oehm6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Meghan Vogel
published
3.78
Michele Gosselin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.75
Samantha Sutphin
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.72
Hillary Riley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.62
Kim Graves
published
3.58
Yayoi Shaw
published
3.54
Morgan Arvisais
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yayoi Shaw + Michele Gosselin6151% games+7.1% vs expected
Hillary Riley + Morgan Arvisais13653% games−4.3% vs expected
Hillary Riley + Samantha Sutphin134 matchesnot enough data
Meghan Vogel + Michele Gosselin213 matchesnot enough data
Morgan Arvisais + Samantha Sutphin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meghan Vogel
15W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Michele Gosselin
99W–90L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Samantha Sutphin
83W–57L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Hillary Riley
69W–65L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Kim Graves
11W–16L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
Yayoi Shaw
17W–15L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Morgan Arvisais
50W–48L career · 4 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.