Teams

MORAGA CC 40MX8.0A

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX8.0

27 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amit Ranade
published 4.5
4.25
Jessica Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.16
Bryan Rodrigues
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.07
Kimberly Prast
published
4.03
3.83
Andrea Ruotsi
published 4
3.81
Ashley McLin
published 4
3.77
3.76
Ari Hersher
published 4
3.72
Carey Andre
published 4
3.70
Lauren Fritch
published
3.69
Harry van Meines
published
3.66
3.66
Connie Koplan
published 4
3.63
Christina Fong
published 4
3.59
Kristen Schaffel
published
3.56
Jessica Edson
published
3.50
Kevin Hack
published
3.40
Erin Ackdoe
published
3.38
Andrew Burke
published 3.5
3.38
Tracey Guerin
published
3.35
Ben Olsen
published 3.5
3.32
Sarah Yancey
published
Doug Purcell
published
Kahn Angsupanich
published
Kunal Jain
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bryan Rodrigues + Jessica Edson7066% games+10.5% vs expected
Bryan Rodrigues + Jessica Kim4257% gamesnot enough data
Bryan Rodrigues + Molly Harcos Tamariki4165% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amit Ranade
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Kim
32W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
4.25
4.5
Bryan Rodrigues
24W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.16
Kimberly Prast
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Christopher Nichols
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
4.03
4
Andrea Ruotsi
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Ashley McLin
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Molly Harcos Tamariki
20W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.77
4
Ari Hersher
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Carey Andre
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Lauren Fritch
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Harry van Meines
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Helena GG Medtcalfe-Singelstad
4W–17L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Christy Belcastro
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Connie Koplan
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Christina Fong
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Kristen Schaffel
17W–17L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Jessica Edson
24W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.56
Kevin Hack
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Erin Ackdoe
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Andrew Burke
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Tracey Guerin
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Ben Olsen
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
Sarah Yancey
19W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Doug Purcell
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kahn Angsupanich
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kunal Jain
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.