Teams

Ke.Nels40A

2025 Capital Adult 40 & Over 2.5 · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-15vs Me.McCaskill40AWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Nels / Erin Reis vs Greyson McGrail / Maeve Gardner7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2025-04-26vs Da.Berry40ALost 01
L#1 DoublesMolly Chaffee / Erin Reis vs Ann Flores / Shannon Clarkson1-6, 2-6
2025-04-12vs Ja.Bossert40ALost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Gentile / Kelly Nels vs Jennifer Cotner / Margaret Barham6-7, 6-7
2025-03-29vs Te.Yasin40A2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesMolly Chaffee / Kelly Nels vs Kacey Barcliff / Carol Ann Mcmillan6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStephanie Ratliff / Erin Reis vs Melissa Pereira / Jeanna Hastie6-4, 7-6
2025-03-22vs An.McNeil40AWon 10
W#2 DoublesMolly Chaffee / Carrie Martinelli vs Connie Dimitroff / Darsan Russo7-6, 6-1
2025-03-08vs Me.McCaskill40AWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin Reis / Courtney Peterson vs Bess Pitt / Austin Coley4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMolly Chaffee / Jessica Oehlrich vs Maeve Gardner / Greyson McGrail6-1, 6-4
2025-03-01vs Da.Berry40ALost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Nels / Stephanie Ratliff vs Shannon Clarkson / Ann Flores6-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Kelly Nels
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.67
Molly Chaffee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.61
Erin Reis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.58
Lauren Gentile
published
2.32
Nicole Nemmers
published
2.20
Jessica Oehlrich
published
Sherri Wichek
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Nels + Lauren Gentile7082% games+20.3% vs expected
Molly Chaffee + Erin Reis12754% games+0.5% vs expected
Erin Reis + Kelly Nels5068% gamesnot enough data
Molly Chaffee + Kelly Nels213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Kelly Nels
69W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.77
3
Carrie Martinelli
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Molly Chaffee
68W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%10%90%
2.67
2.5
Erin Reis
52W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%21%79%
2.61
Lauren Gentile
20W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%26%74%
2.58
Nicole Nemmers
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.32
Jessica Oehlrich
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.20
Sherri Wichek
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.