Teams

Tarpon Tennis Court Coyotes

2026 Pinellas Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.0 W Saturday

15 players · average NTRP 2.93 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-26vs McMullen PronatorsWon 50
W#1 DoublesJulie Kalter / Stella Maganiaris vs Mel Flynn / Bozena Sabala6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMegan Ma vs Rachel Rowat6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichele Sullivan / Leanne Matthews vs Maria Calderon / Nancy Baron6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesBetsy Rutkowski vs Carol Melber6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Goodman / Jennifer Soberal vs Gladys Nunamaker / Cassandra Pauley7-5, 6-1
2026-03-07vs Pinellas/FaraciLost 05
L#1 DoublesDana Galbraith / Connie Williams vs Kerry Shanahan / Catherine Mueller6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLeanne Matthews vs Krista Healy3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Soberal / Michele Sullivan vs Kristina Faraci / Marti Pyle5-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMichele Weinstock vs Kelley Richardsonn4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Goodman / Julie Kalter vs Isabelle Conti / Angela Rashba1-6, 0-6
2026-02-28vs McMullen KosarSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDana Galbraith / Betsy Rutkowski vs Erin Annis / Shelby Tuttle5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMegan Ma vs Emily Corbett6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Kalter / Stella Maganiaris vs Jayme Kosar / Amanda Smith6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMichele Weinstock vs Michelle Butler3-6, 2-6
2026-02-21vs SPTC Holliday 3.0 WWon 32
W#1 DoublesDana Galbraith / Patricia Calhoun vs Christine Assefa / Christine Marascio6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMegan Ma vs Zilya Ruga5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLeanne Matthews / Michele Sullivan vs Kimberly Fiorino / Cindy Eicholtz2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBetsy Rutkowski vs Morgan Tucker2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMichele Weinstock / Stella Maganiaris vs MELISSA ALSINA / Jane Jukes7-6, 6-0
2026-02-14vs Seminole Lake Dsa 3.0 WWon 32
W#1 DoublesDana Galbraith / Patricia Calhoun vs Jessica Spravaka / Celeste Rekieta6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesBetsy Rutkowski vs Rachel Spravka5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Sullivan / Jennifer Soberal vs Nicki Chong / Jeanne Lamme4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLeanne Matthews vs Tiffany Hashem1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Kalter / Anne Goodman vs Hong Liu / Winnelyn Humphrey4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-02-07vs Seminole Lake Overserved JordanLost 13
L#1 DoublesPatricia Calhoun / Stella Maganiaris vs Paula Eurich / Valeska Dykes7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMegan Ma vs Kim Cook6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLeanne Matthews / Connie Williams vs Erica Allums / Beverly Bozarth7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichele Weinstock / Jennifer Soberal vs Debi Billington / Debra Edwards3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-01-31vs SPTC FireballsWon 32
L#1 DoublesBetsy Rutkowski / Dana Galbraith vs Kelly Bernish / Bobbi-Jo Willett6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLeanne Matthews vs Susan Barham6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichele Weinstock / Connie Williams vs Rima Terradista / Amy Terry6-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMegan Ma vs Jane Graham6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnne Goodman / Julie Kalter vs Tiffany Weidner / Suzanne D'Aquin7-5, 6-4
2026-01-24vs Innisbrook The BeachesLost 23
L#1 DoublesPatricia Calhoun / Connie Williams vs Patricia Aliak / Amie Rotz2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMegan Ma vs Melissa Bryan2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Heatherington / Betsy Rutkowski vs Fayola Goldstone / Rhonda Holloway5-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesLeanne Matthews vs Lauren Aumond2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichele Sullivan / Jennifer Soberal vs Vanvisa Cheung / Janice Graham6-3, 6-3
2026-01-17vs Ardea Hueholt 3.0Won 32
L#1 DoublesDana Galbraith / Brook Houck vs Lee Cucchi / Robyn Houston7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMegan Ma vs Lesli Stolly6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPatricia Calhoun / Leanne Matthews vs Cynthia Preyde / Cathy Garcia4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMichele Weinstock vs Monique Sola4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Goodman / Jennifer Soberal vs Kimberly Ankney / Gabriela Tanase6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-01-10vs Countryside Dunn 18Split 22
L#1 DoublesLeanne Matthews / Connie Williams vs Debra Burwell / Chloe Wiard6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBrook Houck vs Wendi Norbut2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMegan Ma vs Tracia Danhour6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Kalter / Anne Goodman vs Brandy Martins / Barbara Turi6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Stella Maganiaris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Jennifer Soberal
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Patricia Calhoun
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.80
Megan Ma
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.78
Dana Galbraith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Leanne Matthews
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
2.76
Julie Kalter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Brook Houck
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Elizabeth Tafone
published 3
2.72
Michele Weinstock
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Betsy Rutkowski
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Connie Williams
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.65
Michele Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.64
Anne Goodman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Anna Heatherington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Kalter + Anne Goodman4155% games+8.7% vs expected
Michele Sullivan + Jennifer Soberal3249% games+3.1% vs expected
Dana Galbraith + Betsy Rutkowski0633% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Calhoun + Stella Maganiaris224 matchesnot enough data
Julie Kalter + Stella Maganiaris213 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Calhoun + Dana Galbraith213 matchesnot enough data
Leanne Matthews + Connie Williams033 matchesnot enough data
Leanne Matthews + Michele Sullivan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stella Maganiaris
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Jennifer Soberal
5W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Patricia Calhoun
12W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
Megan Ma
18W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Dana Galbraith
2W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
2.78
Leanne Matthews
10W–11L career · 9 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Julie Kalter
10W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Brook Houck
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Tafone
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michele Weinstock
4W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Betsy Rutkowski
4W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Connie Williams
2W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.66
Michele Sullivan
7W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Anne Goodman
9W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.64
2.5
Anna Heatherington
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.