Teams

The Players Club

2025 FALL A55&O · FALL Adult 55&Over Women 8.0 Wednesday

11 players · average NTRP / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-01-08vs Olympic 1Won 21
L#1 DoublesJudy Barbao / Kris Susa vs EMILY SAALMAN / Kathy Ruoff6-7, 4-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJanet Disbennett / Tammy M Jarrett vs Lori Brown / Julie Caton6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesYumi Danford / Jonalee Roahrig vs Leanna Cempre / Elizabeth Roose6-1, 6-2
2024-12-11vs Racquet ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesJudy Barbao / Kris Susa vs Pat Rothney / Barbara Sinclair7-6, 5-2
W#2 DoublesYumi Danford / Jonalee Roahrig vs Janine Kiser / Cathy Presper6-4, 5-3
L#3 DoublesGina Urwin / Fujiko Itabashi vs Mary McGuff / Cindy Benedict5-7, 3-6
2024-12-04vs Olympic 2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKris Susa / Judy Barbao vs Lois Dosky / Ann Leithauser6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTammy M Jarrett / Stacey Royer vs Anne Hunnell / Rebecca Long2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesYumi Danford / Yuko Seitz vs Deborah Ellis / Kathleen Kinnard4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-11-13vs Olympic 1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJudy Barbao / Yuko Seitz vs Elizabeth Roose / Michelle Jarrett1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStacey Royer / Tammy M Jarrett vs Mary Jane Hamilton / Julie Caton2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesFujiko Itabashi / Gina Urwin vs Barbara Wiese / Kathy Ruoff6-1, 6-4
2024-11-06vs Racquet ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesYuko Seitz / Gina Urwin vs Susan Snyder / Janine Kiser6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Disbennett / Tammy M Jarrett vs Pat Rothney / Barbara Sinclair6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesYumi Danford / Jonalee Roahrig vs Shelley Finley / Jennifer Willging1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-10-23vs Olympic 2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKris Susa / Judy Barbao vs Lois Dosky / Ann Leithauser4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMeg Perez / Gina Urwin vs Kathleen Kinnard / Deborah Ellis3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTammy M Jarrett / Janet Disbennett vs Anne Hunnell / Jane Heath4-6, 5-7
2024-10-16vs Olympic 1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKris Susa / Judy Barbao vs Michelle Jarrett / Elizabeth Roose1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMeg Perez / Yuko Seitz vs Julie Caton / Mary Jane Hamilton7-5, 5-3
L#3 DoublesJonalee Roahrig / Stacey Royer vs EMILY SAALMAN / Barbara Wiese5-7, 1-6
2024-10-09vs Racquet ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesKris Susa / Judy Barbao vs Susan Sugar / Barbara Sinclair6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTammy M Jarrett / Meg Perez vs Janine Kiser / Susan Snyder6-7, 2-5
W#3 DoublesJanet Disbennett / Gina Urwin vs Shelley Finley / Mary McGuff6-2, 6-1
2024-10-02vs Olympic 2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKris Susa / Meg Perez vs Ann Leithauser / Lois Dosky5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGina Urwin / Tammy M Jarrett vs Jane Heath / Martha Pfeifer4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFujiko Itabashi / Yuko Seitz vs Kathleen Kinnard / Mandi Grohoske3-6, 5-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for FALL Adult 55&Over Women 8.0 Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Kris Susa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Judy Barbao
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Gina Urwin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Yumi Danford
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.62
Meg Perez
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Tammy M Jarrett
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.59
Yuko Seitz
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.52
Jonalee Roahrig
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
Janet Disbennett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
Stacey Royer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Fujiko Itabashi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yumi Danford + Gina Urwin11556% games+6.8% vs expected
Janet Disbennett + Kris Susa17661% games+5.4% vs expected
Janet Disbennett + Judy Barbao9360% games+4.8% vs expected
Meg Perez + Yuko Seitz6656% games+4.6% vs expected
Kris Susa + Judy Barbao1083658% games+3.7% vs expected
Janet Disbennett + Gina Urwin5555% games+3.7% vs expected
Gina Urwin + Yuko Seitz17357% games+3.5% vs expected
Tammy M Jarrett + Yumi Danford8157% games+2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kris Susa
268W–135L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Judy Barbao
185W–84L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
Gina Urwin
159W–103L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Yumi Danford
91W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Meg Perez
65W–77L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Tammy M Jarrett
53W–79L career · 7 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.60
Yuko Seitz
111W–81L career · 5 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.59
Jonalee Roahrig
82W–75L career · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Janet Disbennett
122W–76L career · 4 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Stacey Royer
81W–146L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Fujiko Itabashi
150W–92L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.