Teams

Naples YMCA / Heinrich

2026 Collier Adult 70 & over Winter · Adult 70 & over 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesBarbara Frank / Ellen Hermannsson vs Nancy Black / Hildy Glick3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGail Wille / Barbara Lounsbury vs Ginny Asgeirsson / Patricia Miles6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Hansen / Carola Heinrich vs Susan Sliker / Cathy Guida6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-02-25vs Cambier / SouthallLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Magno / Angela Whinyates vs Peggy Sealfon / Virginia Southall6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Archie / Gail Wille vs Janet Ellis / Joyce Perry6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPatricia Hanes / Barbara Lounsbury vs Constance Cape / Steffanie Huffman6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2026-02-18vs Island Walk / SchmidtWon 21
L#1 DoublesBarbara Frank / Ellen Hermannsson vs Beverly Graham / Elise Kauder4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Hansen / Patricia Hanes vs Linda Santo / Margaret Egger7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKathi Roesler / Carmen Miron vs Linda Orlich / Judith Davis6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesJennifer Archie / Susan Magno vs Kathie Karp / Ginny Asgeirsson3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesCarola Heinrich / Angela Whinyates vs Susan Sliker / Patricia Miles7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesGail Wille / Barbara Lounsbury vs Nancy Black / Sharon Slozil5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-04vs Cambier / SouthallWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Archie / Gail Wille vs Janet Ellis / Constance Cape4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEllen Hermannsson / Barbara Frank vs Joyce Perry / Peggy Sealfon6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarmen Miron / Kathi Roesler vs Tillie Ann Lapierre / Virginia Southall1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-01-28vs Island Walk / SchmidtWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Magno / Jennifer Archie vs Beverly Graham / Elise Kauder6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarola Heinrich / Angela Whinyates vs Linda Santo / Peg Cotter6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathi Roesler / Barbara Lounsbury vs Rebecca Kensey / Judith Davis6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesJennifer Archie / Gail Wille vs Ginny Asgeirsson / Kathie Karp6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBarbara Frank / Ellen Hermannsson vs Nancy Black / Hildy Glick7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Hansen / Carmen Miron vs Cathy Guida / Sharon Slozil3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-01-14vs Cambier / SouthallWon 21
W#1 DoublesAngela Whinyates / Nancy Hansen vs Peggy Sealfon / Virginia Southall7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPatricia Hanes / Susan Magno vs Janet Ellis / Joyce Perry1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesCarmen Miron / Kathi Roesler vs Steffanie Huffman / Tillie Ann Lapierre6-1, 7-5
2026-01-07vs Island Walk / SchmidtWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Magno / Carola Heinrich vs Elise Kauder / Beverly Graham6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBarbara Frank / Ellen Hermannsson vs Jeanne Morgenstern / Linda Orlich7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Hansen / Gail Wille vs Linda Santo / Sue Schmidt6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 70 & over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Angela Whinyates
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Carola Heinrich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Carmen Miron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Barbara Frank
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Ellen Hermannsson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Gail Wille
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Archie
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Kathi Roesler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Patricia Hanes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Magno
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Frank + Ellen Hermannsson7646% gamesnot enough data
Susan Magno + Jennifer Archie6554% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Frank + Patricia Hanes2838% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Hansen + Patricia Hanes5547% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Frank + Nancy Hansen314 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Frank + Susan Magno404 matchesnot enough data
Kathi Roesler + Carmen Miron303 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Hansen + Susan Magno303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angela Whinyates
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Carola Heinrich
15W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Carmen Miron
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Barbara Frank
44W–54L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Ellen Hermannsson
7W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gail Wille
4W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Archie
8W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathi Roesler
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Hansen
71W–73L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Hanes
36W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Magno
164W–72L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.