Teams

3.0 Singles- Skinner

2025 Shenandoah Singles Winter Weekday · Shenandoah Singles Winter Weekday 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-31vs Single Shot- NilssonLost 02
L#1 SinglesCarthina Marple vs Fiona Campbell0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesSarah Eickelberg vs Emily Allen1-6, 4-6
2025-03-17vs Hahn - WCCLost 01
L#1 SinglesStacy Mowry vs Rachel Hahn2-6, 2-6
2025-03-10vs Single Shot- NilssonWon 20
W#1 SinglesKelly Rowley vs Courtney Brown6-3, 6-6
W#3 SinglesSarah Eickelberg vs Sarah Midgley7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-24vs Hahn - WCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesStacy Mowry vs Rachel Hahn6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesSarah Eickelberg vs Sarah Browning6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-17vs Single Shot- NilssonWon 20
W#1 SinglesStacy Mowry vs Dalyah Ronzio5-7, 4-1
W#2 SinglesCarthina Marple vs Suzi Molak6-4, 6-3
2025-01-27vs Single Shot- NilssonLost 01
L#1 SinglesKelly Rowley vs Dalyah Ronzio4-6, 3-6
2025-01-13vs Hahn - WCCWon 10
W#1 SinglesKelly Rowley vs Rachel Hahn2-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Singles Winter Weekday 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Stacy Mowry
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Kelly Rowley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Erin Burnett
published 3
2.93
Sarah Eickelberg
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.64
Sara Jane Sherry
published
2.39
Carthina Marple
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.36
Ella Rash
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Rowley + Stacy Mowry9062% games+10.4% vs expected
Kelly Rowley + Sarah Eickelberg3254% games+0.6% vs expected
Sarah Eickelberg + Stacy Mowry6163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Stacy Mowry
87W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.59
3.5
Kelly Rowley
65W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3
Erin Burnett
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.11
3
Sarah Eickelberg
51W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.93
Sara Jane Sherry
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
2.5
Carthina Marple
50W–87L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%81%19%
2.39
2.5
Ella Rash
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.