Teams

Slicing Shots

Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-04vs Fantastic Girls 55+Won 21
W#1 DoublesNan Barash / Shelly Rabuse vs Min Foga / Lynne Buchman7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCaryn KarmatzRudy / Nancy Silverman vs Gail Goldman / Megan Reddish1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDebra Lorah / Christine Walker vs Donna Costa / Jackie Chew6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-28vs Rock Paper ScissorsWon 21
W#1 DoublesNan Barash / Shelly Rabuse vs Diane Maund / Linda Mullin6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEmily Morgan / Beth Schonberger vs Tomiko Saito / Minako Kobayashi3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Silverman / Melinda Tuan vs Lee Alexander / Kelly Rasero7-5, 3-4, 1-0
2026-07-21vs UMLY 55Won 21
W#1 DoublesNan Barash / Tatyana Kansburg vs Kathleen Glikes / Sharon Spaeder6-4, 5-1
W#2 DoublesDebra Lorah / Angela Pidutti vs Carol Leslie / Jaclyn Baver6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChristine Walker / Suzanne Leiser vs June Teufel / Cindy MacKay6-7, 1-2
2026-07-14vs Lemon LoveLost 12
W#1 DoublesShelly Rabuse / Nan Barash vs Deborah Novak / Anna Ouimet6-1, 4-3
L#2 DoublesCaryn KarmatzRudy / Suzanne Leiser vs Karen Clark / Kris Scoffone4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Walker / Mary Marshall vs Lisa Kaplan / Jodi Knapp5-7, 1-2
2026-07-07vs Locked and LoadedLost 03
L#1 DoublesNan Barash / Kim Clearkin vs Carol Cannon / Joyce Shiau4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Lorah / Naomi Thorpe vs Veronica Fox / Jill O'Neill5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Morgan / Melinda Tuan vs Elizabeth Austin / Sandra Parcells3-6, 4-6
2026-06-30vs Lucky PenniesWon 30
W#1 DoublesNan Barash / Shelly Rabuse vs Kelly Flannery / Susan Campbell6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNaomi Thorpe / Tatyana Kansburg vs Barbara Burdick / Christine Walter6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDebra Lorah / Angela Pidutti vs Jackie Zimmerman / Linda Hasz7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lemon Love0611717136
2Lucky Pennies0611719150
3Fantastic Girls 55+0610820162
4Rock Paper Scissors069920151
5Locked and Loaded069920164
6Slicing Shots0610821168
7UMLY 550631531200

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Naomi Thorpe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.91
Shelly Rabuse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Nan Barash
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Beth Schonberger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Debra Lorah
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Tatyana Kansburg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Angela Pidutti
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Caryn KarmatzRudy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Kim Clearkin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Nancy Silverman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Melinda Tuan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Suzanne Leiser
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Christine Walker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Emily Morgan
published
Mary Marshall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Pidutti + Nan Barash5262% games+14.8% vs expected
Beth Schonberger + Emily Morgan3267% games+13.7% vs expected
Nancy Silverman + Emily Morgan7354% games+7.3% vs expected
Angela Pidutti + Debra Lorah7256% games+5.9% vs expected
Debra Lorah + Tatyana Kansburg9460% games+5.7% vs expected
Debra Lorah + Nan Barash101252% games−0.4% vs expected
Angela Pidutti + Suzanne Leiser4549% games−0.7% vs expected
Nancy Silverman + Melinda Tuan5747% games−0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Naomi Thorpe
198W–127L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Shelly Rabuse
45W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
3.91
4
Nan Barash
200W–142L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Beth Schonberger
74W–65L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Debra Lorah
292W–215L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Tatyana Kansburg
250W–152L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Angela Pidutti
39W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65
4
Caryn KarmatzRudy
44W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Kim Clearkin
117W–97L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
Nancy Silverman
132W–109L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Melinda Tuan
75W–72L career · 2 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.48
Suzanne Leiser
13W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46
4
Christine Walker
46W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
3.25
Emily Morgan
95W–89L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Marshall
12W–16L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.