Teams

Penn Pals

2022 Adult 65 and Over League · 6.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.07 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-12vs Kupuna Dream TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarie-Christine Hothan / Martha Welch vs Linda Lingle / Glenda Fischbach6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTerry Beuret / Pam Isayama vs Sarah Kistler / Martha Minson6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Gardetto / Wendy Jackson vs Sharon Winton / Susan Weander6-3, 6-2
2022-09-25vs HIGH FIVEWon 21
W#1 DoublesMartha Welch / Terry Beuret vs Charlotte Loo / Anne Hayashida6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTessa Travers / Maureen O'Guin vs Michelene Sekiya / Gwen Okahara2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarie-Christine Hothan / Gwenette Higa vs Dorothy Umeda / KARIN OKINAGA6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-09-18vs Happy Happy Hour!Won 30
W#1 DoublesSusie Jannuzzi / Pam Isayama vs Karen Nose / Eileen Quinn6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMartha Welch / Terry Beuret vs Phyllis Klein / Iris Tomita6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNancy Nagamine / Wendy Jackson vs Catherine Hiranaka / April Will6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-09-04vs Hi 65ersWon 21
W#1 DoublesMartha Welch / Marie-Christine Hothan vs Pam Wheat / Rae Tadaki6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGwenette Higa / Ann Gardetto vs Phyllis Tsukayama / Marge Bernice6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTerry Beuret / Tessa Travers vs Lynette Furukawa / Miho May1-6, 4-6
2022-08-28vs Kupuna Dream TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesTessa Travers / Maureen O'Guin vs Sarah Kistler / Linda Onomoto6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesGwenette Higa / Ann Gardetto vs Linda Lingle / Glenda Fischbach1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPam Isayama / Nancy Nagamine vs Patricia Meara / Martha Minson6-0, 6-0
2022-08-21vs HIGH FIVEWon 21
W#1 DoublesTessa Travers / Marie-Christine Hothan vs Lois Saruwatari / Norene Ihori6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesGwenette Higa / Ann Gardetto vs Alexis McCallum / KARIN OKINAGA7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPam Isayama / Nancy Nagamine vs Charlotte Loo / Anne Hayashida1-6, 1-6
2022-08-14vs Happy Happy Hour!Won 30
W#1 DoublesGwenette Higa / Ann Gardetto vs Eileen Quinn / Ann Choy6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMartha Welch / Maureen O'Guin vs Pamela Chow / Iris Tomita6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Nagamine / Susie Jannuzzi vs Phyllis Klein / Karen Nose6-2, 6-3
2022-07-31vs Hi 65ersWon 21
L#1 DoublesMartha Welch / Ann Gardetto vs Phyllis Tsukayama / Marge Bernice6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMaureen O'Guin / Tessa Travers vs Lynette Furukawa / Faith Inoshita6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Nagamine / Wendy Jackson vs Barbara Furugen / Miho May6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Marie-Christine Hothan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.98
Tessa Travers
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.87
Nancy Nagamine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Ann Gardetto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Gwenette Higa
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.72
Susie Jannuzzi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Maureen O'Guin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Martha Welch
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Pam Isayama
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Stacy Ray
published
Terry Beuret
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Wendy Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Nagamine + Marie-Christine Hothan7164% games+12.3% vs expected
Nancy Nagamine + Ann Gardetto8167% games+5.5% vs expected
Gwenette Higa + Ann Gardetto14655% games+3.7% vs expected
Maureen O'Guin + Stacy Ray3544% games+1.0% vs expected
Nancy Nagamine + Susie Jannuzzi3254% games−1.2% vs expected
Maureen O'Guin + Susie Jannuzzi7454% games−2.4% vs expected
Tessa Travers + Maureen O'Guin7748% gamesnot enough data
Gwenette Higa + Maureen O'Guin2638% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Marie-Christine Hothan
42W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
3.5
Tessa Travers
24W–81L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Nancy Nagamine
59W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Ann Gardetto
51W–35L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Gwenette Higa
31W–38L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Susie Jannuzzi
34W–31L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Maureen O'Guin
64W–101L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.66
Martha Welch
45W–33L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Pam Isayama
10W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stacy Ray
15W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Terry Beuret
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wendy Jackson
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.