Teams

LA - Victorious Secret

2021 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#2 DoublesSharona Malekan / Ana Calleja vs Nadine Ellman / Xiaochun Wang4-6, 3-6
2021-10-17vs LA - Downtown AcesWon 10
W#2 DoublesSharona Malekan / Donna Sanders vs Tamar Stevens / Meredith Levine6-4, 6-4
2021-09-26vs LA - Queen AnneLost 01
L#2 DoublesSharona Malekan / Ana Calleja vs Gloria Geller / Chloe Allred0-6, 4-6
2021-09-12vs LA - Shadow's AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesAna Calleja / Sharona Malekan vs Didi Sowul / Allison Langus5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Maria de Carvalho
published
3.86
Maria Rose
published 4
3.83
Leah Lavin
published
3.65
Martina Mass
published
3.60
Shannon Minor
published
3.60
Debbie Zolla
published 4
3.60
Michelle Farhadi
published
3.58
Betty Shalom
published 3.5
3.56
Michelle Wild
published
3.38
Heidi Wettenhall
published 3.5
3.38
Sharona Malekan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Alexis Cittadine
published 3.5
3.15
Jennifer Demoff
published
3.08
Kathleen Dohrmann
published
2.76
Susan Moreno
published
Julie Rockwell
published
Sarah Nist
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria de Carvalho
9W–11L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
4.17
4
Maria Rose
101W–51L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.86
Leah Lavin
6W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.83
Martina Mass
7W–11L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
Shannon Minor
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Debbie Zolla
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
Michelle Farhadi
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Betty Shalom
121W–55L career · no lines in 2021
<1%26%74%
3.58
Michelle Wild
10W–14L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Heidi Wettenhall
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Sharona Malekan
55W–40L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Alexis Cittadine
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
Jennifer Demoff
6W–7L career · no lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.15
Kathleen Dohrmann
4W–11L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
Susan Moreno
26W–57L career · no lines in 2021
97%3%<1%
2.76
Julie Rockwell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sarah Nist
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.