← Teams

MAC-Mangan/Lekas

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.95 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Amy Risch
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.94
Melanie Morris
published 3
2.76
Dorothy Cofield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Anne Mangan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Elizabeth Large
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Sally Papadimas
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.56
Ellen Wood
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.43
Susan Sienko
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Harshi Waters
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.23
Jane Crisan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Results8 ties
2024-11-24Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJane Crisan / Sally Papadimas vs Carmen Warda / Lucila Griesser7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Sienko / Elizabeth Large vs Anne Stein-Gray / Ivy Lane6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHarshi Waters / Catherine Kubik vs Sharon Place / Rhonda Baker6-2, 6-1
2024-11-17Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesAnne Mangan / Amy Risch vs Amy Hicks / Molly Wilson6-4, 7-6
2024-11-03Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesDorothy Cofield / Amy Risch vs Diana Blebea / Miwako Kobayashi1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSally Papadimas / Debbie Ackroyd vs Cindy Bennett / Cynthia Ross-Brockett7-5, 6-6
2024-10-19Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesAmy Risch / Melanie Morris vs Suzanne Friedman / Mihee Park7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDebbie Ackroyd / Ellen Wood vs Judy Potts / Catherine Lofts6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSally Papadimas / Holly Lekas vs KIT THAKKAR / Jennifer Thompson6-3, 6-1
2024-10-13Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesEllen Wood / Liz Campbell vs Christy Locke / Cynthia Escamilla6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnne Mangan / Amy Risch vs Hiroe Felix / Lilian Tsi Stielstra6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusan Sienko / Elizabeth Large vs Wendy Chase / Karen Wales6-1, 6-0
2024-09-21Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJane Crisan / Ellen Wood vs Vanessa Gallant / Angela Diaz de Leon6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Younie / Harshi Waters vs Colleen Atherton / Michelle Gay6-2, 6-2
2024-09-14Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesSally Papadimas / Dorothy Cofield vs Cricket Forsey / Lisa Mayer6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Sienko / Elizabeth Large vs Jodi Wilkins / Susanne Cochran6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHolly Lekas / Anne Mangan vs Nancy Heck / Sharon Place6-4, 6-1
2024-09-08Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesDorothy Cofield / Jane Crisan vs Christine Egan / Dianna Kaady6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBarbara Mesher / Sally Papadimas vs Katherine Fisher / Claire C Gates6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Amy Risch
46W–36L career
8%92%0%
3.13
3
Melanie Morris
25W–25L career
0%90%10%
2.94
3
Dorothy Cofield
82W–134L career · type A
2%97%1%
2.76
3
Anne Mangan
62W–74L career
6%91%4%
2.75
3
Elizabeth Large
19W–48L career
3%97%0%
2.71
3
Sally Papadimas
48W–101L career
9%91%0%
2.64
3
Ellen Wood
43W–79L career · type A
20%80%0%
2.56
3
Susan Sienko
28W–77L career · type A
52%48%0%
2.43
2.5
Harshi Waters
22W–25L career
not enough data
—
2.5
Jane Crisan
5W–28L career
0%94%6%
2.23

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.