Teams

54, going on

2023 Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over · Anne Arundel 55 & Over 8.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-06-28vs The Seasoned Vicious VolliesLost 01
L#2 DoublesWendy Jones / Joi Remoll vs Carol Humphrey / Janette O Logan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-22vs Ladies of Yalich 8.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Anderson / Joi Remoll vs Jade Moore / Marie Sokoloff6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2023-06-14vs 55NetchixWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoi Remoll / Sally Labella vs Teri Fitch / Lily Openshaw6-2, 6-1
2023-06-08vs Ladies of Yalich 8.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesVeronica Townsend / Donna Worthington vs Carrie Wofford / Marie Sokoloff6-2, 6-4
2023-06-01vs B&B BuddiesWon 10
W#2 DoublesPamela Cahouet / Donna Worthington vs Tami Burt / Jill Lehr6-0, 6-2
2023-05-22vs The Seasoned Vicious VolliesLost 01
L#1 DoublesSally Labella / Joi Remoll vs Claris Brock / Shelena Sanderson2-6, 5-7
2023-05-15vs Davis' Divas 8.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesDonna Worthington / Karen Anderson vs Bonnie Muheim / Bobbi Farquhar6-0, 6-2
2023-05-06vs 55NetchixSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoi Remoll / Karen Anderson vs Lily Openshaw / Hedy Brandt3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Sweeney / Donna Worthington vs Diana Heinze / Joan Ferrell3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-23vs The Betty'sWon 10
W#1 DoublesWendy Jones / Donna Worthington vs Robin Burton / Susie Bird6-3, 6-3
2023-04-16vs B&B BuddiesWon 10
W#2 DoublesJune Means / Joi Remoll vs Cathy Bulkley / Ellen McLaughlin6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Joi Remoll
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Karen Anderson
published
3.70
Diane Sweeney
published 4
3.65
Helen Patterson
published
3.65
Mary Jane Evans
published
3.55
June Means
published
3.44
Lynne Powell
published
3.38
Donna Worthington
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Cameron Caskin
published 3.5
Marla Lusby
published
Paula McCarthy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Jane Evans + Diane Sweeney134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Joi Remoll
143W–83L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.84
Karen Anderson
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.77
4
Diane Sweeney
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
Helen Patterson
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Mary Jane Evans
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
June Means
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.55
Lynne Powell
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Donna Worthington
129W–123L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Cameron Caskin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marla Lusby
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paula McCarthy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.