Teams

Suarez

2024 One Doubles · 4.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-09vs The Ball SlappersLost 01
L#1 DoublesKyle Moore / Arun Chokkalingam vs Michael Hua / Aditya Iyer2-6, 2-6
2024-08-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesArun Chokkalingam / Kyle Moore vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-27vs Mann On The HuntLost 01
L#1 DoublesChad O'Connor / Tomas Suarez vs Jacob Mann / Nick Fulcher2-6, 2-6
2024-07-14vs Sop is HimLost 01
L#1 DoublesTomas Suarez / Steven Ruhoy vs Adam Brown / Andy Anh Le0-6, 4-6
2024-06-29vs Tell him he's dreaminLost 01
L#1 DoublesArun Chokkalingam / Kyle Moore vs Darrell Huang / Jonathan Zhu4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings19 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sop is Him6060022
2NWW-Liu5151241
3NWW-Berisha5151249
4Soper Team5151341
5NWW-Calpagiu5151438
6Tell him he's dreamin4242444
7The Tied Breakers4242449
8Lobbing Lickitungs ™4242540
9Mann On The Hunt3333647
10Nish3333649
11The Ball Slappers2424854
12Moms Spaghetti2424859
13Love at First Serve2424968
14Evolution of Schlap2424951
15Backstreet Men2424967
16Suarez15151060
17Mann 215151062
18Hans' Revenue Streams15151068
19Varon06061274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Chad O'Connor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Steven Ruhoy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Arun Chokkalingam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.57
Kyle Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Tomas Suarez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Arun Chokkalingam + Tomas Suarez134 matchesnot enough data
Steven Ruhoy + Tomas Suarez134 matchesnot enough data
Chad O'Connor + Tomas Suarez123 matchesnot enough data
Tomas Suarez + Kyle Moore123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chad O'Connor
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Steven Ruhoy
55W–60L career · 1 line in 2024
17%83%<1%
4.14
4.5
Arun Chokkalingam
57W–74L career · 3 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
4.00
Kyle Moore
13W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Tomas Suarez
21W–61L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.