Teams

Lakeland Beerman - R. Espitia

2024 Polk (NA) Casual League · 3.0 Plus

15 players · average NTRP 3.21 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-11-12Won 10
W#3 Female DoublesSvetlana Darrow / Kandy Wood vs Dionne Kohl / Courtney McCrystal7-5, 6-3
2024-11-05Won 10
W#3 Female DoublesSvetlana Darrow / Kandy Wood vs Sabina Elmasri / Hetal Rajguru6-0, 6-2
2024-10-22Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesAnna Previte / Svetlana Darrow vs Kerrie Hall / Lauren Lloyd2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-15Lost 01
L#1 Female DoublesSvetlana Darrow / Karola Cordero vs Tiffany Choe / Brandye Pickering2-6, 1-6
2024-10-08Lost 01
L#1 Female DoublesAnna Previte / Svetlana Darrow vs Marcia Whitney / Geraldine Tardy1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-10-01vs LCC - E. PaulWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesAnna Previte / Svetlana Darrow vs Holly Daniels / Brandy Lansford6-3, 6-2
2024-09-24Lost 01
L#3 Female DoublesLaurie Grieger / Svetlana Darrow vs Meghan Savant / Amber Maloney4-6, 4-6
2024-09-17vs Beerman - T. RitterWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesSvetlana Darrow / Laurie Grieger vs Leisa Jordan / Courtney Wade7-5, 6-2
2024-09-03Lost 01
L#1 Female DoublesTessie Beltran / Svetlana Darrow vs Ashley Bailey / Joan Baldava1-6, 4-6
2024-08-27Won 10
W#4 Female DoublesSvetlana Darrow / Kandy Wood vs Rose Coulton / Courtney Philpot6-4, 7-5
2024-08-20vs WH City Raquettes - V. BarfieldWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesLaurie Grieger / Svetlana Darrow vs Kim Schmucker / Mary Stine6-1, 6-0
2024-08-13vs LCC - E. PaulLost 01
L#4 Female DoublesSvetlana Darrow / Diane Barrera vs Lamanda Petcoff / Ruthie Tait5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Plus have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Tessie Beltran
usually #1 Female Doubles 47%, also #2 Female Doubles 29% · published
3.19
Anna Previte
usually #2 Female Doubles 59%, also #1 Female Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.11
Cynthia Nettles
published 3.5
3.03
Melissa Darch
usually #2 Female Doubles 77%, also #1 Female Doubles 12% · published 3.5
3.00
Karola Cordero
usually #2 Female Doubles 60%, also #1 Female Doubles 20% · published
2.95
Ginger Davis
usually #1 Female Doubles 37%, also #4 Female Doubles 32% · published 3.5
2.81
Laurie Grieger
published
2.80
Jihyeon Choe
published
2.80
Kristin Wyatt
published
2.75
Svetlana Darrow
usually #3 Female Doubles 42%, also #1 Female Doubles 42% · published
2.67
Regina Espitia
published
2.64
Alyce Badcock
published 3
2.57
Julie Goodwin
published
2.55
Kandy Wood
usually #1 Female Doubles 31%, also #2 Female Doubles 31% · published 3
2.31
Diane Barrera
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Darch + Anna Previte211750% games+9.1% vs expected
Ginger Davis + Anna Previte17757% games+7.3% vs expected
Tessie Beltran + Anna Previte8357% games+6.6% vs expected
Kristin Wyatt + Jihyeon Choe5451% games+5.9% vs expected
Ginger Davis + Melissa Darch3451% gamesnot enough data
Svetlana Darrow + Kandy Wood4351% gamesnot enough data
Svetlana Darrow + Anna Previte3247% gamesnot enough data
Ginger Davis + Svetlana Darrow213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tessie Beltran
67W–80L career · 17 lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Anna Previte
99W–73L career · 22 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Cynthia Nettles
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Melissa Darch
63W–77L career · 17 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
Karola Cordero
58W–67L career · 10 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.00
3.5
Ginger Davis
113W–97L career · 19 lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.95
Laurie Grieger
12W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
Jihyeon Choe
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.80
Kristin Wyatt
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
Svetlana Darrow
86W–95L career · 12 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
Regina Espitia
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Alyce Badcock
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
2.64
Julie Goodwin
6W–21L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.57
3
Kandy Wood
53W–82L career · 12 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
2.55
2.5
Diane Barrera
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%93%7%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.