Teams

SATL40/KLangley/CCS

USTA Adult 40 & Over (3.0-4.5) · Women - 3.5

4 players · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-22vs SATL40/LYLES/SACWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatherine Langley / Catherine Bass Black vs Joan Smith / Jamie Miller4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Malcolm / Hadley Inabinet vs Amy Eskew / Cathy Brinegar6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-04-15vs SATL40/LYLES/SACSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKatherine Langley / Catherine Bass Black vs Joan Smith / Natalie Barry6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHadley Inabinet / Carolyn Crenshaw vs Kelli Wood / Jamie Miller1-6, 2-6
2026-04-01vs SATL40/LYLES/SACSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Malcolm / Hadley Inabinet vs Jamie Miller / Joan Smith7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesFaith Pope / Meghan Teague vs Jane Krason / Natalie Barry6-7, 6-7
2026-03-25vs SATL40/LYLES/SACWon 21
W#1 DoublesHadley Inabinet / Elizabeth Malcolm vs Natalie Barry / Kelly Birch6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKatherine Langley / Catherine Bass Black vs Cathy Brinegar / Amy Eskew4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMeghan Teague / Faith Pope vs Courtney Nix / Joan Smith1-6, 3-6
2026-03-18vs SATL40/LYLES/SACWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatherine Langley / Hadley Inabinet vs Courtney Nix / Inna Sysa6-1, 6-1
2026-03-11vs SATL40/LYLES/SACWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Malcolm / Hadley Inabinet vs Amy Eskew / Edie Clator6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatherine Langley / Meghan Teague vs Marieta Borillo / Jane Krason6-2, 7-5
2026-03-04vs SATL40/LYLES/SACWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Malcolm / Hadley Inabinet vs Joan Smith / Jamie Miller4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFaith Pope / Meghan Teague vs Natalie Barry / Amy Eskew6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKatherine Langley / Sally Coker vs Ruza Pocivavsek / Courtney Nix7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Elizabeth Malcolm
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.30
Hadley Inabinet
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.21
Katherine Langley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Faith Pope
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hadley Inabinet + Elizabeth Malcolm12067% games+21.4% vs expected
Faith Pope + Elizabeth Malcolm5167% games+18.4% vs expected
Hadley Inabinet + Katherine Langley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Malcolm
57W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.50
Hadley Inabinet
24W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Katherine Langley
19W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Faith Pope
16W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.