Teams

HBSQ-Yeigh

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-25vs CP-Court Crushers-CarlsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaurie Nelson / Kathy Brindle vs Kelly Chiang / Linda Greenlaw3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesYvonne Collins / Stephanie Ellis-Smith vs Helen Jiang / Wendy Reynolds2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSandy Yeigh / Francoise O'Donnell vs Colleen Grobstok / Dana Laursen0-6, 0-6
2025-10-18vs MC-W 6.0-JayLost 03
L#1 DoublesMolly Hilll / Laurie Nelson vs Nancy Edwards / Jill LaRosa1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesYvonne Collins / Diane Erickson vs Debbie Schrock / Jackie Fuller1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Brindle / Francoise O'Donnell vs Diane Lee / Angela Ratcliff4-6, 6-7
2025-10-12vs NTC-WillgerodtLost 12
W#1 DoublesMolly Hilll / Laurie Nelson vs Erin Bell / Kristi Edwards6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeanette Brandal / Margaret Anaya vs Rebecca Zimmer / Adora Moncada0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesYvonne Collins / Francoise O'Donnell vs Seiko Kobayashi / Mayumi Willgerodt4-6, 1-6
2025-10-04vs RBW-Group Therapy-WilkinsLost 03
L#1 DoublesYvonne Collins / Jeanette Brandal vs Laurie Wilkins / Janet Chee1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Anaya / Laurie Nelson vs Kristine Kleinsmith / Michele Lalime2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesShirley Havenga / Sandy Yeigh vs Rose Flowers / Ruth Chan1-6, 0-6
2025-09-28vs TCSP-Love All-CamposLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeanette Brandal / Kathy Brindle vs Vicki Cronin / Suzie Heid3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesYvonne Collins / Debra Alanis vs Teresa Engrav / Jenny Sanders2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSandy Yeigh / Francoise O'Donnell vs Stacey Kryman / Mary Ransom0-6, 0-6
2025-09-21vs BETC-IwasakiLost 12
L#1 DoublesYvonne Collins / Debra Alanis vs Shelly Hebert / Lauri Iwasaki6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathy Brindle / Diane Erickson vs Juliet Wu / Barbara Turner6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMargaret Anaya / Francoise O'Donnell vs Jacqueline DeLeon / Nadine Zgonc3-6, 3-6
2025-09-13vs NWW-CAC/SL-KingLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Brindle / Yvonne Collins vs Bunny Rogan / Julie Dewitt0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesShirley Havenga / Diane Erickson vs Kathy Olson / Michelle Michael1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Park / Laurie Nelson vs Kim Carey / Christel McArthur0-6, 0-6
2025-09-05vs CP-Court Crushers-CarlsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiane Erickson / Yvonne Collins vs Kelly Chiang / Karen Choi6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMargaret Anaya / Stephanie Park vs Lili Chang / Dana Laursen1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSandy Yeigh / Debra Alanis vs Helen Jiang / Heidi Hollyhead3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Molly Hilll
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Kathy Brindle
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.57
Diane Erickson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.52
Debra Alanis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.48
Stephanie Ellis-Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.07
Francoise O'Donnell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeanette Brandal
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Laurie Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Margaret Anaya
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Sandy Yeigh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shirley Havenga
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Stephanie Park
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Yvonne Collins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Yeigh + Margaret Anaya1435% games−5.9% vs expected
Laurie Nelson + Francoise O'Donnell1440% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Yeigh + Debra Alanis134 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Yeigh + Francoise O'Donnell044 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Anaya + Francoise O'Donnell134 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Park + Margaret Anaya033 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Park + Francoise O'Donnell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Hilll
66W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.44
Kathy Brindle
11W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
3
Diane Erickson
10W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
3
Debra Alanis
7W–23L career · type A · 8 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
3
Stephanie Ellis-Smith
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
Francoise O'Donnell
25W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Jeanette Brandal
0W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Laurie Nelson
5W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Margaret Anaya
10W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandy Yeigh
8W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shirley Havenga
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Park
7W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Yvonne Collins
13W–28L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.