Teams

TCooper/AEagan (Weddington)

2022 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-06Won 10
W#3 DoublesLori Holman / Laurie Madonna vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-05vs MWilliams (Raintree)Won 10
W#3 DoublesHeather Burch / Laurie Madonna vs Melissa Orr / Rachel Staton6-1, 6-1
2022-09-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesLaurie Madonna / Kelsey Gerber vs Caitlin Reidway / Janie Miller6-0, 6-0
2022-09-01vs RJampani (Blakeney)Won 10
W#3 DoublesHeather Burch / Laurie Madonna vs Diane DeMus / Debbie Ebensberger6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-08-25Won 10
W#3 DoublesKristina Campbell / Laurie Madonna vs Allison Ledoux / Caitlin Reidway6-3, 6-1
2022-08-18vs TLaBrosse (Carmel)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKristina Campbell / Laurie Madonna vs Brooke Cole / Katie O'Shea6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Amanda Eagan
published 3
2.91
Mary Wolf
published
2.73
Tasha Cooper
published
2.69
Kristina Campbell
published
2.58
Laurie Madonna
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 2.5
2.57
Lori Holman
published
2.55
Lisa Leake
published
2.49
Heather Burch
published 2.5
2.23
Tracy Amos
published
Kelsey Gerber
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Madonna + Kristina Campbell5165% games+15.7% vs expected
Heather Burch + Laurie Madonna2351% gamesnot enough data
Heather Burch + Lisa Leake224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amanda Eagan
31W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.01
Mary Wolf
38W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
Tasha Cooper
13W–15L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Kristina Campbell
32W–13L career · no lines in 2022
0%8%92%
2.69
2.5
Laurie Madonna
90W–89L career · 10 lines in 2022
0%27%73%
2.58
Lori Holman
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.57
Lisa Leake
13W–16L career · no lines in 2022
0%34%66%
2.55
2.5
Heather Burch
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
0%52%48%
2.49
Tracy Amos
16W–16L career · no lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.23
Kelsey Gerber
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.