Teams

4.0 DCRV Hall W40Sday

2022 SPRING Adult 40 & Over DAYTIME · 40 & Over Day 4.0 Thurs

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-17vs 4.0 PTC SparksCran W40SdayLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlison Hall / Elizabeth Rusy vs Jennifer Jones / Carla Johnstone1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKathryn Daley / Maureen Johnston vs Joan Simondet / Candiss Crannell1-6, 0-6
2022-03-10vs 4.0 PTC SparksCran W40SdayLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaureen Johnston / Angela Tanigawa vs Jodi Lawrence / Tina Rathke2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMarie Welsh vs Alexis Robison0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Doseck / Alison Hall vs Stacy Hoeder / Carla Johnstone2-6, 6-7
2022-03-03vs 4.0 PTC SparksCran W40SdayLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Bates / Sara Estervig vs Pam Rahhal / Monica Smith0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKelly Rexroat vs Maria Brockbank1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMaureen Johnston / Elizabeth Rusy vs Christina McGraw / Stacy Hoeder3-6, 0-6
2022-02-17vs 4.0 PTC SparksCran W40SdayLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathryn Daley / Angela Tanigawa vs Monica Smith / Kelly Sparks0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSara Estervig vs Maria Brockbank0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHeidi Holland / Debbie McAllister vs Pam Rahhal / Christina McGraw2-6, 3-6
2022-02-10vs 4.0 PTC SparksCran W40SdayLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlison Hall / Marie Welsh vs Jennifer Jones / Tamara Lorson0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRobin L Mather vs Janice Gennone2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRenae Brooks / Judy Doseck vs Candiss Crannell / Stephanie Clark7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-02-03vs 4.0 PTC SparksCran W40SdayLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebbie McAllister / Maureen Johnston vs Cindy Fonseca / Tina Rathke3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHeidi Holland vs Alexis Robison2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathryn Daley / Angela Tanigawa vs Joan Simondet / Jodi Lawrence2-6, 2-6
2022-01-27vs 4.0 PTC SparksCran W40SdayLost 03
L#1 DoublesJudy Doseck / Alison Hall vs Cindy Fonseca / Tamara Lorson1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSara Estervig vs Maria Brockbank2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Bates / Heidi Holland vs Joan Simondet / Kelly Sparks1-6, 1-6
2022-01-20vs 4.0 PTC SparksCran W40SdayLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarie Welsh / Renae Brooks vs Janice Gennone / Stephanie Clark6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKelly Rexroat vs Maria Brockbank1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Rusy / Kathryn Daley vs Pam Rahhal / Christina McGraw2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 40 & Over Day 4.0 Thurs
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14.0 PTC SparksCran W40Sday80231395
24.0 DCRV Hall W40Sday0812347287

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Nancy Bates
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Judy Doseck
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Renae Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.39
Angela Tanigawa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.35
Heidi Holland
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Debbie McAllister
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Elizabeth Rusy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Alison Hall
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Kelly Rexroat
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Kathryn Daley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Marie Welsh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Maureen Johnston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Robin L Mather
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Sara Estervig
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Rexroat + Sara Estervig4160% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Holland + Maureen Johnston0534% gamesnot enough data
Kathryn Daley + Maureen Johnston033 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Rexroat + Heidi Holland033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Bates
49W–50L career · 2 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
Judy Doseck
165W–192L career · 3 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Renae Brooks
96W–131L career · 2 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.44
4
Angela Tanigawa
4W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
3.39
3.5
Heidi Holland
102W–166L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Debbie McAllister
47W–37L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Elizabeth Rusy
9W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Alison Hall
81W–130L career · 4 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Kelly Rexroat
57W–110L career · 2 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
Kathryn Daley
14W–21L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marie Welsh
9W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maureen Johnston
0W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Robin L Mather
65W–29L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Sara Estervig
27W–18L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.