Teams

BIR BARTLETT

2026 FW Adult 40 & Over League - Ladies · Sunday Ladies 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.36 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-22vs STC ZAVASKYSplit 11
L#1 SinglesRosanna Yau vs Nikki Smith4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Blakey / Julia Fitsimones vs Janet Helsel / Janet Black7-5, 7-5
2026-02-15vs RTC CAULEY/KNIGHTWon 20
W#1 SinglesRosanna Yau vs Diana Ahmad6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJulia Fitsimones / Camille Reid vs Meredith Billings / Camille Hand6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-02-08vs RTC CATESSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJulia Fitsimones / Camille Reid vs Ashley Harris / Stephanie Robinson3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKim Brockman / Kimberly Knox vs Lindsey Castner / Cathy Parsons2-6, 4-6
2026-01-31vs DMS FIELDINGWon 20
W#2 DoublesJulia Fitsimones / Camille Reid vs Amy Burson / Twana Holmes6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKim Brockman / Rosanna Yau vs Johnna Jones / Penny Cosper6-3, 6-1
2026-01-18vs RTC OMARAWon 20
W#1 SinglesCamille Reid vs Kavita Brignac7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKim Brockman / Julia Fitsimones vs Janet Helsel / Anita Owen-Myers6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-01-11vs RTC CAULEY/KNIGHTWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulia Fitsimones / Camille Reid vs Nancy Bromley / Barbara Shlesinger6-2, 6-3
2026-01-04vs STC ZAVASKYLost 02
L#2 DoublesJulia Fitsimones / Kimberly Knox vs Elizabeth Wayland / Tiffany Larza7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRhonda Harmon / Rosanna Yau vs Ashley Harris / Beau Bone3-6, 5-7
2025-12-14vs DMS FIELDINGSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulia Fitsimones / Camille Reid vs Sharilynn Gates / Johnna Jones2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKim Brockman / Rosanna Yau vs Lori Ruehle / Lesia Allen6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Sunday Ladies 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Stephanie Hamar
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
3.48
Katie Cretella
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
3.42
Barbarita Nieri
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Chandra Holt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Kim Brockman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Tiffany Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Camille Reid
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.31
Kimberly Knox
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.28
Rhonda Harmon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Kimberly Blakey
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.27
Melanie Bartlett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Rosanna Yau
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.21
Julia Fitsimones
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
3.08
Gillian Ashton
published 3.5
3.06
Brandy Oetman
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.03
Courtney Hesse
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
2.90
Heidi Ferrell
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.63
Samantha Dubeck
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julia Fitsimones + Kimberly Knox1449% games+8.2% vs expected
Barbarita Nieri + Katie Cretella7165% games+7.1% vs expected
Heidi Ferrell + Brandy Oetman5255% games+6.2% vs expected
Barbarita Nieri + Tiffany Rogers4161% games+4.8% vs expected
Kim Brockman + Rosanna Yau10164% games+2.7% vs expected
Julia Fitsimones + Kimberly Blakey2351% games+1.0% vs expected
Camille Reid + Julia Fitsimones12560% games−0.1% vs expected
Melanie Bartlett + Tiffany Rogers261452% games−1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Hamar
14W–7L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Katie Cretella
30W–7L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%55%44%
3.48
3.5
Barbarita Nieri
31W–16L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Chandra Holt
42W–5L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
Kim Brockman
18W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
Tiffany Rogers
48W–28L career · 16 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Camille Reid
18W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.37
Kimberly Knox
22W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Rhonda Harmon
13W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
Kimberly Blakey
36W–27L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Melanie Bartlett
27W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Rosanna Yau
16W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Julia Fitsimones
28W–15L career · 8 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Gillian Ashton
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Brandy Oetman
36W–13L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
3.5
Courtney Hesse
17W–12L career · type A · 9 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Heidi Ferrell
34W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Samantha Dubeck
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.