Teams

OC- Los Cab- Michelle

2022 Adult Capstone League Winter · Women's 5.0 Plus Capstone

11 players · average NTRP 4.58 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#2 DoublesAllison Sterett / Valerie Tan vs Linda Lyke / Ghia Godfree6-1, 7-5
2022-03-27vs OC- Los Cab- TracyLost 01
L#1 DoublesValerie Tan / Allison Sterett vs Debbie Spence-Nasim / Betsy Purpura0-6, 1-6
2022-03-06vs OC- Los Cab- TracyWon 10
W#3 DoublesVicky Blanco / Michele Mouttapa vs Karen Haas / Tracy Harris6-2, 6-0
2022-03-06vs BC- Los Cab- KathyLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichele Mouttapa / Vicky Blanco vs Maria Lupu / Melanie McClain4-6, 6-7
2022-02-27vs BC- Los Cab- KathyLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichele Mouttapa / Vicky Blanco vs Tomoko Elliott / Erica Smalley1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTracy Muesing / Vicky Blanco vs Leticia Alcala / Christina Catipay6-3, 6-4
2022-02-06Lost 01
L#3 DoublesVicky Blanco / Kelly Ross vs Tomoko Elliott / Penny Finders2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTracy Muesing / Vicky Blanco vs Ghia Godfree / Linda Lyke4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 5.0 Plus Capstone have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.45 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.93
Sanem Ahearn
published
4.63
Brahna Pastorini
published 5
4.46
Lajla Feichter
published 4.5
4.45
Michele Mouttapa
published 4.5
4.42
Allison Sterett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.39
Kelly Ross
published
4.39
Melissa Rosenthal
published
4.33
Krystal Meier
published 4.5
4.29
Valerie Tan
published
4.19
Vicky Blanco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Tracy Muesing
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Krystal Meier + Kelly Ross6360% games+2.9% vs expected
Krystal Meier + Vicky Blanco10461% gamesnot enough data
Michele Mouttapa + Krystal Meier3252% gamesnot enough data
Michele Mouttapa + Vicky Blanco2345% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sanem Ahearn
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
4.93
5
Brahna Pastorini
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.63
4.5
Lajla Feichter
74W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
4.46
4.5
Michele Mouttapa
125W–80L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
4.45
4.5
Allison Sterett
123W–62L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
4.42
Kelly Ross
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
4.39
Melissa Rosenthal
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
4.39
4.5
Krystal Meier
55W–56L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
4.33
Valerie Tan
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
4.29
4.5
Vicky Blanco
131W–100L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
Tracy Muesing
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.