Teams

ROUND HILL CC CW5.5B

2021 COMBO · Women 5.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Jill Carlstrom
published
3.33
Susie Hansen
published
3.33
Hui Xie
published 3.5
3.21
Sarah Shapiro
published
3.14
Trish Nornhold
published
3.02
Christi Deakin
published 3.5
3.02
Mickie Kerr
published
2.94
Julie Takano-Peters
published
2.74
Jamie Damaschino
published 3
2.73
Christy Watson
published 3
2.70
Tara Preston
published
2.67
Shelly Cuny
published
2.67
Rachel Miegel
published
2.55
Maria Angel-Ordonez
published
2.52
Kuldip Chohan
published
2.45
Michelle Stratmore
published
2.15
Amy Bame
published 2.5
Julie Peloquin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Carlstrom + Susie Hansen4160% games+0.3% vs expected
Mickie Kerr + Julie Takano-Peters224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Carlstrom
16W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.40
Susie Hansen
20W–12L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Hui Xie
22W–13L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
Sarah Shapiro
11W–10L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
Trish Nornhold
5W–13L career · no lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Christi Deakin
9W–5L career · no lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.02
Mickie Kerr
11W–16L career · no lines in 2021
<1%44%56%
3.02
Julie Takano-Peters
6W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%32%
2.94
3
Jamie Damaschino
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Christy Watson
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
Tara Preston
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.70
Shelly Cuny
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
2.67
Rachel Miegel
2W–13L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%1%
2.67
Maria Angel-Ordonez
13W–22L career · no lines in 2021
0%35%65%
2.55
Kuldip Chohan
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
2.52
Michelle Stratmore
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
0%66%34%
2.45
2.5
Amy Bame
0W–8L career · no lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Julie Peloquin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.