Teams

SGrindle (WSRC)

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.61 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-01vs KAllen/KRichards (Raintree)Won 30
W#1 DoublesRubina Batt / Anita Corum vs Erin Moser / Shelby Stahl6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Barrett / Vickie Koskinas vs Nicole Love / Donna Marlowe6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSherry Teat / Nancy Klug vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-24vs KHeidkamp (PCC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Klug / AMY SAFIR vs Penny Hill / Joan Bullard6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJennifer Gibson / Rubina Batt vs Kristin Heidkamp / Charlotte Renner7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJane Neese / Bobbie McManus vs Susie Fragale / Judi Affeldt6-3, 6-1
2023-04-17vs JJohnson/MDwyer (Carmel)Won 21
W#1 DoublesAMY SAFIR / Rubina Batt vs Molly Dwyer / Paris Loesch6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNancy Klug / Kelley Montroy vs Kathryn Klaus / Sarah Soule2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesScarlet Grindle / Amy Barrett vs Jennifer Johnson / Tricia Magee6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-30vs CMiles (Queens)Split 11
W#1 DoublesAMY SAFIR / Nancy Klug vs Christine Miles / Barbara Clement6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKelley Montroy / Vickie Koskinas vs Ramonette Belen / Melina Adcock4-6, 2-6
2023-03-27vs KCronin/AFink (Piper Glen)Won 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Klug / Anita Corum vs Rebecca Cooper / Maria Leahy6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBobbie McManus / Kathleen O'Donnell vs Lori Broome / Stephanie Rock3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Barrett / Sherry Teat vs Angela Donathan / Sarah Garner6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-03-13vs DdeArmas (Firethorne)Won 20
W#1 DoublesRubina Batt / AMY SAFIR vs Diane Hegele / Kathy Sawrey6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBobbie McManus / Vickie Koskinas vs Patty Swan / Brenda Cage6-3, 7-6
2023-03-06vs KAllen/KRichards (Raintree)Won 30
W#1 DoublesRubina Batt / Anita Corum vs Staci Wittek / Rachel Hallsten6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAMY SAFIR / Jean Lee Pirkey vs Katrina Richards / Shelby Stahl3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen O'Donnell / Sherry Teat vs Donna Marlowe / Jill Smith6-3, 7-5
2023-02-27vs KHeidkamp (PCC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Klug / AMY SAFIR vs Christine Leavitt / Penny Hill5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnita Corum / Jennifer Gibson vs Kristin Heidkamp / Maggie Wheeler7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesScarlet Grindle / Amy Barrett vs Joan Bullard / Trina Blankenship6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Kristin Kapur
published 4
3.64
Rubina Batt
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.47
AMY SAFIR
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.46
Anita Corum
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.44
Kelley Montroy
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.35
Nancy Klug
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 3.5
3.33
Jean Lee Pirkey
published
3.33
Kathleen O'Donnell
published
3.19
Vickie Koskinas
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.13
Sherry Teat
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.97
Jane Neese
published
2.92
Bobbie McManus
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.82
Scarlet Grindle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Klug + AMY SAFIR211455% games+2.0% vs expected
Anita Corum + Kelley Montroy6256% games−0.1% vs expected
AMY SAFIR + Kelley Montroy9262% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Klug + Sherry Teat3257% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Klug + Bobbie McManus4176% gamesnot enough data
Vickie Koskinas + Kelley Montroy2350% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Klug + Anita Corum224 matchesnot enough data
Scarlet Grindle + Vickie Koskinas224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristin Kapur
123W–57L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Rubina Batt
75W–22L career · 8 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
AMY SAFIR
191W–93L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Anita Corum
89W–49L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Kelley Montroy
138W–99L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%67%32%
3.44
3.5
Nancy Klug
148W–104L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
Jean Lee Pirkey
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.33
Kathleen O'Donnell
33W–29L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Vickie Koskinas
102W–104L career · 8 lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Sherry Teat
115W–51L career · 7 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Jane Neese
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.97
3.5
Bobbie McManus
36W–54L career · 6 lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
2.92
Scarlet Grindle
103W–60L career · 5 lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.