Teams

Burkwood Johnson

2024 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-07vs TDC SpillareLost 01
L#1 DoublesCynthia Muncy / Melissa Allen vs Elizabeth Walkley / Kaitlin Marschke4-6, 4-6
2024-05-31vs Salisbury- AndrewsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Allen / Renee Culley vs Brittney Watkins / Alicia Watkins6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-05-29vs Woodlake CookseyWon 10
W#2 SinglesMelissa Allen vs Robin Oldt6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2024-05-24vs WOCC-Moehling/Stringer 3.5 WEEKDAYLost 01
L#2 DoublesRenee Culley / Melissa Allen vs Anne-Marie Anderson / Jenny Norfleet2-6, 1-6
2024-05-21vs Raintree- MartinWon 10
W#2 DoublesCynthia Muncy / Melissa Allen vs Kathryn Darling / Donna Moody6-3, 6-0
2024-05-17vs Hermitage- Stinson/WhitbyLost 01
L#1 DoublesCynthia Muncy / Melissa Allen vs ANJA BAUGH / Amery Whitby6-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Renee Culley
published
3.37
Cynthia Muncy
published 3.5
3.28
Melissa Allen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Yen Huynh
published
3.09
Lynne Moore
published
3.05
Tricia Jones
published
3.01
Diana Gary
published 3.5
3.01
Francine Durbin
published 3.5
2.83
DAYNA SCHOOLS
published 3
Beth Johnston
published 3
Lynne Read
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Culley + Cynthia Muncy404 matchesnot enough data
Diana Gary + Lynne Moore123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Renee Culley
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Cynthia Muncy
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Melissa Allen
116W–116L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
Yen Huynh
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Lynne Moore
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.09
Tricia Jones
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Diana Gary
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
3.5
Francine Durbin
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
DAYNA SCHOOLS
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Beth Johnston
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lynne Read
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.