Teams

Swing IT 40&over

Winter Adult 40 & Over WeekEND · Mens 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.64 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-03-05vs Sultans of SwingLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephen Ellis / Scott Callaway vs Ken Jenkins / Thomas Tulig1-6, 3-6
2023-02-19vs Polo Club 3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesEric Abell / Stephen Ellis vs Gary Shelly / Scott Coleman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-02-12Lost 01
L#1 SinglesStephen Ellis vs Karthik Subramanian3-6, 3-6
2023-01-29vs Westwood 3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Kim / Corey Pavletich vs Luke Bourlon / Pat Woodman6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mens 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alejandro Puyana
published 4
3.48
Jason Fraley
published
3.47
TROY MADRES
published
3.45
Keith Parker
published
3.42
Corey Pavletich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Chris Brownson
published 3.5
3.24
Blair Streit
published 3.5
3.22
Trevor Winters
published
3.20
Paul Herbst
published
3.16
Eric Abell
published 3.5
3.09
Stephen Ellis
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.81
Michele Granata
published
Jose Rodriguez
published
Kyle Fox
published
Robert Kim
published
Scott Callaway
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Blair Streit + Eric Abell9163% games+10.3% vs expected
Stephen Ellis + Eric Abell5360% games+1.6% vs expected
Stephen Ellis + Trevor Winters6457% games−2.8% vs expected
Trevor Winters + Paul Herbst2546% gamesnot enough data
Blair Streit + Keith Parker5166% gamesnot enough data
Blair Streit + Paul Herbst3258% gamesnot enough data
Keith Parker + Paul Herbst224 matchesnot enough data
Blair Streit + Trevor Winters033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alejandro Puyana
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Iker Jose Dieguez Bonilla
29W–22L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.65
Jason Fraley
32W–30L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
TROY MADRES
29W–28L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
Keith Parker
54W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Corey Pavletich
59W–24L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Chris Brownson
36W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Blair Streit
47W–20L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
Trevor Winters
28W–24L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Paul Herbst
25W–43L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Eric Abell
35W–26L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Stephen Ellis
46W–66L career · 3 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
Michele Granata
72W–39L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
Jose Rodriguez
43W–25L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kyle Fox
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Kim
51W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Callaway
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.