Teams

HPTA - Heavy Ballz

Adult Tri-Level League · Men's Tri Level Del-Ches

12 players · average NTRP 4.38 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2021-10-16vs Ace KickersWon 20
W#1 DoublesHenrik Svensson / Zachary Schulz vs William Metz / Joe Grant6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBen Hurtig / Joe Picerno vs Jayadevan Thekele Madam / Christopher Chamberlain4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-10-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesHenrik Svensson / Carl Reichert vs Kyle Rhood / Steven Graflage7-6, 6-4
2021-10-09Lost 02
L#1 DoublesStephen Belcher / Paolo Quimbo vs Joe Grant / Tyler Hogan2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Silverman / Ben Hurtig vs Jedrick-Leo Boca / Taichi Naka1-6, 4-6
2021-10-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesZachary Schulz / Henrik Svensson vs Ankur Arya / Alfredo Perez3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-09-25Split 11
L#2 DoublesStephen Belcher / Paolo Quimbo vs Jun Avila / John Bishop0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCourtland Hooks / MIHN NGUYEN vs Alexander Hsia / Taichi Naka7-6, 6-0
2021-09-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHenrik Svensson / Zachary Schulz vs Tonatiuh Chavez / Tim Ross5-7, 3-6
2021-09-18vs Upper DublinLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatrick Carretas / Paolo Quimbo vs Michael Hankin / Corey Garnier5-7, 4-6
2021-09-11Split 11
L#1 DoublesBrandon Dinh / Canh Ho vs Tyler Hogan / Bas van Lent2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMIHN NGUYEN / Blake Rhood vs Bret Cohen / Michael Silverman2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-09-11vs Ace KickersLost 02
L#1 DoublesHenry Kim / Paolo Quimbo vs Henrik Svensson / Carl Reichert3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPatrick Carretas / Nicholas Doan vs David Boyd / Vikram Karumanchi2-6, 2-6
2020-10-24vs Ace KickersLost 03
L#1 DoublesCanh Ho / Chan Kang vs Zachary Schulz / Carl Reichert6-3, 5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Nerenberg / James Toh vs Pat Brady / Robert Donahue2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMIHN NGUYEN / Jedrick-Leo Boca vs Christopher Chamberlain / Amish Shah5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2020-10-11vs Upper DublinWon 30
W#1 DoublesCanh Ho / Chuck Jones vs Corey Garnier / David Steger1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeff Nerenberg / James Toh vs David Boyd / Albert LaBrusciano6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMIHN NGUYEN / Jedrick-Leo Boca vs Tim Tirendi / James Conklin7-5, 7-5
2020-10-04vs Ace KickersWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaolo Quimbo / Henrik Svensson vs Robert Donahue / Pat Brady7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLouie Carretas / Patrick Carretas vs David Donovan / Jayadevan Thekele Madam1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBen Hurtig / Jedrick-Leo Boca vs Amish Shah / Merrick Morris7-5, 7-5
2020-09-20vs Upper DublinWon 21
L#1 DoublesHenrik Svensson / James Toh vs Richard King / Tom Sellig2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPatrick Carretas / Jeff Nerenberg vs Albert LaBrusciano / David Boyd6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJedrick-Leo Boca / MIHN NGUYEN vs Royce Fu / Frank Grosso6-4, 2-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Men's Tri Level Del-Ches
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HPTA - Heavy Ballz317512137

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Canh Ho
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.33
Henrik Svensson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Chuck Jones
published 4.5
4.02
Paolo Quimbo
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.76
Patrick Carretas
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.67
Ben Hurtig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.35
MIHN NGUYEN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Chan Kang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
James Toh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jedrick-Leo Boca
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeff Nerenberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Louie Carretas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Carretas + Paolo Quimbo8754% games+5.5% vs expected
Jedrick-Leo Boca + MIHN NGUYEN213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Canh Ho
255W–118L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
4.36
4.5
Henrik Svensson
111W–107L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Chuck Jones
170W–94L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Paolo Quimbo
50W–24L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%44%56%
4.02
Patrick Carretas
45W–43L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Ben Hurtig
82W–37L career · 3 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
MIHN NGUYEN
80W–76L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.35
Chan Kang
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
James Toh
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jedrick-Leo Boca
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeff Nerenberg
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Louie Carretas
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.