Teams

V - North Ranch Rockstars

2021 USTA Adult 40 &Over - WEEKDAY WOMEN · Ventura - Women 3.5 WD

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-07-20vs V - Mission Oaks Love HurtsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSonia Bekian / Donna Leidersdorf vs Kerstin Monical / Lynne Krueger6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-29vs V - Sunset OverservedLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Iezza / Rosalind Ng vs Marie Smith / Nicole Mitchell3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesShari Schiff / Wendy Dormer vs Lisa Brady / Pauline McLean3-6, 1-6
2021-06-14vs V - Rancho Madera Grand SlammersWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Iezza / Rosalind Ng vs Sheryl Grant / Patricia Tracy6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAngela Reynolds / Shari Schiff vs Susie Forrest / Mary Snow6-3, 6-3
2021-06-10vs V - WACettesLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Friedman / Marti Spencer vs Susan Cass / Melissa Heath2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
3.50
Lisa Iezza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Brooke Roth
published 3.5
3.38
Angela Reynolds
published 3.5
3.13
Amy Whitney
published 3.5
3.08
Erin Brubach
published 3.5
3.04
Shari Schiff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Houri Kazanjian
published 3.5
3.00
Susan Friedman
published
2.98
Marti Spencer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Donna Leidersdorf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Wendy Dormer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shari Schiff + Marti Spencer81146% games−7.4% vs expected
Lisa Iezza + Marti Spencer91153% gamesnot enough data
Donna Leidersdorf + Marti Spencer10951% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Iezza + Shari Schiff6651% gamesnot enough data
Erin Brubach + Marti Spencer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heather Morganson
70W–55L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Lisa Iezza
149W–108L career · 2 lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Brooke Roth
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Angela Reynolds
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Amy Whitney
8W–16L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Erin Brubach
11W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Shari Schiff
85W–99L career · 2 lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Houri Kazanjian
4W–13L career · no lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.02
Susan Friedman
9W–18L career · no lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
3.00
3.5
Marti Spencer
144W–198L career · 1 line in 2021
55%45%<1%
2.98
3.5
Donna Leidersdorf
37W–56L career · 1 line in 2021
77%23%<1%
2.90
Wendy Dormer
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.