Teams

Spill the T

Fall Adult 18 & Over WeekEND (Non-Adv) · Womens 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Womens 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Lauren Uhler
published
3.32
Danielle Rueda
published 3.5
3.24
Charulata Ghosh
published 3.5
3.20
Michelle Rueda
published
3.13
Melissa Koshy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Julia Wallace
published
3.11
Carolyne Black
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.06
Madison Russ
published
3.04
Alexis Villegas
published 3.5
2.99
Corrin Gani
published 3
2.93
Kelli Corcoran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Madeleine Sharp
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Katherine Brown
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Chelsea Poe
published 3
Sarah Peabody
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexis Villegas + Madison Russ3353% games+15.6% vs expected
Madeleine Sharp + Carolyne Black12264% games+13.4% vs expected
Kelli Corcoran + Melissa Koshy6075% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Rueda + Danielle Rueda134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Uhler
9W–17L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Danielle Rueda
8W–10L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Charulata Ghosh
9W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
Michelle Rueda
6W–14L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Melissa Koshy
44W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
Julia Wallace
5W–9L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.13
3
Carolyne Black
53W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.11
Madison Russ
32W–16L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
3.5
Alexis Villegas
22W–15L career · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.04
3
Corrin Gani
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
Kelli Corcoran
41W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Madeleine Sharp
27W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Katherine Brown
12W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Chelsea Poe
8W–9L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Sarah Peabody
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.