Teams

Maier

2022 St. Marys Tri-Level Mixed · St Marys Tri-Level Mixed 4.0,3.5,3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-11-08vs PhungWon 10
W#2 DoublesKevin Findley / Kristina Lebron vs Sabra Szczyglowski / Alan Griffin6-3, 6-2
2022-10-29vs PhungLost 01
L#1 DoublesJesse Carrington / Brandie Sparr vs Bruce Willhide / Marissa Romanek6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-10-20vs BergenWon 10
W#2 DoublesKristina Lebron / Joseph Taylor vs Becky Lebow / Ahmed Abdellatif6-2, 6-1
2022-10-09vs PhungWon 10
W#1 DoublesTrey Gladwell / Brandie Sparr vs Sara Vance / Jason Wynn6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2022-10-08vs BergenWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoseph Taylor / Kristina Lebron vs Rob Slawson / Casey MCFANN7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for St Marys Tri-Level Mixed 4.0,3.5,3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Brandie Sparr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Rick Gladwell
published
3.67
Kevin Findley
published
3.66
Susan Maier
published
3.64
Jake Heibel
published 4
3.57
Joseph Taylor
published
3.50
Megan Gladwell
published
3.32
Kristina Lebron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Benjamin Brierty
published 3
2.73
Karen Adriani
published
Jena Carrington
published
John Neville
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Maier + John Neville314 matchesnot enough data
Rick Gladwell + Jena Carrington303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brandie Sparr
104W–102L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Rick Gladwell
7W–0L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Kevin Findley
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Susan Maier
14W–3L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Jake Heibel
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
Joseph Taylor
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
Megan Gladwell
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Kristina Lebron
63W–53L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3
Benjamin Brierty
2W–0L career · type M · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Adriani
0W–11L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%0%
2.73
Jena Carrington
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John Neville
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.