Teams

LARNER/ HOPKINS

2021 Loudoun Doubles Afternoon Winter Women · Doubles Afternoon Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-03-23vs PROVIDAKESWon 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Marcotte / Wendy Edwards vs Wendy Massarelli / Kathleen McFarlane6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-02-26vs HEINLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoanna Schindler / Jea Lee vs Yesim Temeemi / Michelle Tenhaeff2-6, 1-6
2021-02-17Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSian Perez-Baumann / Joanna Schindler vs Angela Kane / April Providakes6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-02-12vs Zimmerman/KaplanWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Marcotte / Heather Drach vs HEATHER HUGHES / Ashley Furman7-6, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Doubles Afternoon Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Jennifer Larner
published
3.42
Laura Sagen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.37
Diane Schuler
published 3.5
3.27
Joanne Good
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Kimberly Murray
published
3.13
Elizabeth Marcotte
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Kristi Nault
published
3.00
Joanna Schindler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Janet Thede
published
Marcia Pokrant
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Schuler + Kristi Nault6447% games−5.6% vs expected
Elizabeth Marcotte + Joanne Good4640% gamesnot enough data
Kristi Nault + Joanne Good303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Larner
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Laura Sagen
164W–159L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Diane Schuler
7W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Joanne Good
85W–87L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Kimberly Murray
7W–15L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Elizabeth Marcotte
166W–176L career · 2 lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
3.13
Kristi Nault
16W–13L career · no lines in 2021
17%82%<1%
3.12
3
Joanna Schindler
69W–70L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%51%49%
3.00
Janet Thede
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Marcia Pokrant
19W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.