Teams

Gaddy Winter 2025 Mixed Tournamant

2025 Tuscaloosa USTA Mixed Tournament 18 & Over -Winter · 2.5 Adult Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-02-09vs Thomas 2.5 Mixed Doubles 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesGeorge Lake / Amy Taylor vs Wes Chapman / Jenifer Spears5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNoah Pepper / Aidan Clark vs Andy Horn / Beth Thomas0-6, 0-6
2025-02-08vs Thomas 2.5 Mixed Doubles 18+Lost 12
W#1 DoublesFrankie Malone / Aidan Clark vs Joel Sayre / Brenda Sayre6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNoah Pepper / Amy Taylor vs Andy Horn / Beth Thomas5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMitchell Gaddy / Lucy Gaddy vs Jenifer Spears / Wes Chapman0-6, 0-6
2025-02-08vs Thomas 2.5 Mixed Doubles 18+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNnambi Coleman / George Lake vs Jenifer Spears / Wes Chapman4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFrankie Malone / Lucy Gaddy vs Joel Brouwer / Wendy Rawlings2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Taylor / Mitchell Gaddy vs Joel Sayre / Brenda Sayre2-6, 2-6
2025-02-08vs Thomas 2.5 Mixed Doubles 18+Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Taylor / George Lake vs Joel Brouwer / Wendy Rawlings6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNnambi Coleman / Noah Pepper vs Andy Horn / Beth Thomas2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAidan Clark / Frankie Malone vs Wes Chapman / Jenifer Spears2-6, 1-6
2025-02-07vs Thomas 2.5 Mixed Doubles 18+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLucy Gaddy / Mitchell Gaddy vs Andy Horn / Beth Thomas0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesFrankie Malone / Nnambi Coleman vs Brenda Sayre / Joel Sayre3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAidan Clark / Noah Pepper vs Wendy Rawlings / Joel Brouwer2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.20 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.38
George Lake
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Aidan Clark
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.23
Frankie Malone
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.98
Nnambi Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lucy Gaddy
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mitchell Gaddy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Noah Pepper
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lucy Gaddy + Mitchell Gaddy044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
George Lake
30W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.38
2.5
Aidan Clark
2W–8L career · type M · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Frankie Malone
17W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.23
Nnambi Coleman
2W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Lucy Gaddy
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mitchell Gaddy
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Noah Pepper
4W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.