Teams

APEX:Joanna:Pond

2024 ME Fall Tri Level · Women's 4.0

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-12-08vs Apex:KonieczkoWon 10
W#1 DoublesMartha Long / Anne Vaillancourt vs Ellen Konieczko / Sharon Wedge6-2, 6-1
2024-12-08vs FF:SommerLost 01
L#1 DoublesLorraine Fagela / Martha Long vs Leah Sommer / Kristie Green4-6, 4-6
2024-11-16vs MP:Meserve:MeserveWon 10
W#1 DoublesLorraine Fagela / Anne Vaillancourt vs Hiroko Meserve / Jennifer Blanchette6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2024-11-16vs Apex:MarroquinLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoanna Pond / Anne Vaillancourt vs Claudia Marroquin / Emily Aldous6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-11-10vs Apex:KonieczkoLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoanna Pond / Susie Coughlin vs Ellen Konieczko / Sharon Wedge0-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-11-03vs MP:Meserve:MeserveWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoanna Pond / Susie Coughlin vs Hiroko Meserve / Jennifer Blanchette7-6, 6-2
2024-11-03vs Apex:MarroquinWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoanna Pond / Susie Coughlin vs Chelsie Woods / Claudia Marroquin7-5, 6-4
2024-10-06vs APEX:KapothanasisWon 10
W#1 DoublesLorraine Fagela / Martha Long vs Valentina Kapothanasis / Anastasia Kapothanasis6-3, 6-4
2024-10-06vs FF:SommerLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoanna Pond / Susie Coughlin vs Kristie Green / Leah Sommer3-6, 5-7
2024-09-21vs APEX:KapothanasisLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoanna Pond / Susie Coughlin vs Anastasia Kapothanasis / Valentina Kapothanasis4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Anne Vaillancourt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Martha Long
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Joanna Pond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lorraine Fagela
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susie Coughlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susie Coughlin + Joanna Pond14855% games+5.3% vs expected
Anne Vaillancourt + Martha Long2345% games+2.9% vs expected
Lorraine Fagela + Anne Vaillancourt5349% games−1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anne Vaillancourt
105W–92L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
Martha Long
50W–46L career · 7 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Joanna Pond
72W–36L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lorraine Fagela
62W–48L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susie Coughlin
24W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.