Teams

CV-Rancho La Quinta/Armitage & J Campbell

2022 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 8.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-23vs CV-Palm Desert TC/J HouseSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKatie Buechel / Kathleen Rae vs Julie House / Carole Myser2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Gillen / Judy Anderson vs Kimberly Skorupa / Gillen Keogh6-0, 6-1
2022-03-21vs CV-Embassy Tennis Club/SashaSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAmy Gillen / Kathleen Rae vs Cathy Evangelist / Janette Morris6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Eldredge / Judy Anderson vs Julie Kratzig / Sally Schwartz6-1, 6-2
2022-03-02vs CV-Mission Hills/RomaniaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCeleste Armitage / Judy Anderson vs Cheryl Evans / Monterey Xepoleas3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKathleen Rae / Katie Buechel vs Manuela Andrews / Susan Devereaux6-3, 6-3
2022-02-16vs CV-Ironwood/Ringer & AllmanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCeleste Armitage / Janice Campbell vs Carla Breton / Angela Peixotto-Monk6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKatie Buechel / Kathleen Rae vs Susan Markowitz / Roberta Dierks6-0, 6-2
2022-02-09vs CV-Rancho Las Palmas/PollsLost 01
L#1 DoublesCeleste Armitage / Amy Gillen vs Monica McCready / Jill Lawrence Polls1-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesCeleste Armitage / Janice Campbell vs Susan Mayer / Rikki Daniels7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSusan Eldredge / Judy Anderson vs Anne Medzegian / Christine Querrey3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesJanice Campbell / Celeste Armitage vs Sharon Fleming / Ria Lepage3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Anderson / Susan Eldredge vs Karen Cunningham / Cynthia Turner4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Celeste Armitage
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.28
Katie Buechel
published
Kathleen Rae
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Janice Campbell
published
Judy Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Laura Webb
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Celeste Armitage + Janice Campbell41040% gamesnot enough data
Judy Anderson + Celeste Armitage033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Celeste Armitage
70W–83L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
Katie Buechel
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Kathleen Rae
58W–33L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Janice Campbell
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Judy Anderson
18W–24L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Webb
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.