Teams

Fanney - Short Skirts Long Racquets

2025 Hampton Roads Combo Mixed · Hampton Roads Combo Mixed 8.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.14 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-06vs Eight Five Sum BeachesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCaroline Dozier / Patrick Conde vs Betty Domanski / Michael McMahon6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesNicole Legum / Brian Sweitzer vs Rycy Godette / Josh Pierce3-6, 3-6
2025-10-30vs Eight Five Sum BeachesLost 01
L#2 DoublesClaire Walters / Patrick Conde vs Lisa Deaver / David Nekoumand2-6, 1-6
2025-10-09vs Eight Five Sum BeachesWon 10
W#3 DoublesYoko Fukuda / Brian Sweitzer vs Michael Stoney / Christina Bartholomew6-4, 6-1
2025-10-02vs Eight Five Sum BeachesWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicole Legum / James Bracey vs Rycy Godette / David Nekoumand4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Combo Mixed 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Christian Basnight
published 4.5
4.13
Debby Levi
published 4.5
4.07
Claire Walters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Brian Sweitzer
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.85
Patrick Conde
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
Rogelio Valdez
published
3.79
Matthew Mazzoni
published
3.76
Nicole Legum
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.75
Caroline Dozier
published 4
3.72
James Bracey
published
3.46
Karen van Daniker
published
Yoko Fukuda
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Legum + Brian Sweitzer8457% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christian Basnight
3W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.17
4.5
Debby Levi
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
4
Claire Walters
28W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%32%68%
4.07
4
Brian Sweitzer
152W–86L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Patrick Conde
42W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
Rogelio Valdez
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
Matthew Mazzoni
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.79
4
Nicole Legum
124W–109L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Caroline Dozier
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
James Bracey
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.72
Karen van Daniker
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Yoko Fukuda
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.