Teams

El.Copeland40C

2024 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 8.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-07vs Ch.Higgins40CSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDanielle Wilder / Terry Dale vs Chunhui Higgins / Sarah Shelby7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMaureen Sredl / Mary Money vs Rachel Davis / Mary Prabel2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-10-04vs Ch.Higgins40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Weygandt / Maureen Sredl vs Donna Bauman / Chunhui Higgins6-7, 1-6
2024-09-23vs Ch.Higgins40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesDanielle Wilder / Barbara Timinskas vs Sarah Shelby / Stacey Burkert6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Copeland / Laura Weygandt vs Laura McNiven / Leah Weinberger6-4, 6-4
2024-09-09vs Ch.Higgins40CLost 01
L#3 DoublesErin Rankin / Mary Money vs Stacey Burkert / Leigh Mullins2-6, 5-7
2024-08-26vs Ch.Higgins40CWon 21
W#1 DoublesDanielle Wilder / Terry Dale vs Donna Bauman / Sarah Shelby6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Remley / Kristal Nelson vs Rochelle Grieco / Nannette Goodwin6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesErin Rankin / Mary Money vs Laura McNiven / Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo6-0, 6-7, 0-1
2024-08-19vs Ch.Higgins40CWon 10
W#3 DoublesLaura Weygandt / Elizabeth Copeland vs Stacey Burkert / Rochelle Grieco6-3, 6-1
2024-08-12vs Ch.Higgins40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesDanielle Wilder / Terry Dale vs Rachel Davis / Laura McNiven2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaureen Sredl / Barbara Timinskas vs Rochelle Grieco / Sandy Wood6-1, 6-0
2024-08-05vs Ch.Higgins40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesTanya Parise / Mary Money vs Leigh Mullins / Sarah Shelby6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHeather Remley / Kristal Nelson vs Nannette Goodwin / Leah Weinberger6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Danielle Wilder
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.42
Heather Remley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.38
Tanya Parise
published 4.5
4.14
Elizabeth Copeland
published 4.5
4.13
Erin Rankin
published 4.5
3.95
Maureen Sredl
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Laura Hiller
published
3.77
Laura Weygandt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Barbara Timinskas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Kristal Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Terry Dale
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Mary Money
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.37
Emily Culbreth
published 3.5
Jane Britt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Money + Maureen Sredl3947% games+7.9% vs expected
Danielle Wilder + Mary Money15558% games+4.3% vs expected
Danielle Wilder + Heather Remley6358% games+4.3% vs expected
Heather Remley + Kristal Nelson4164% games+2.2% vs expected
Kristal Nelson + Mary Money251156% games+0.8% vs expected
Danielle Wilder + Maureen Sredl31959% games+0.5% vs expected
Danielle Wilder + Kristal Nelson9557% games−2.1% vs expected
Danielle Wilder + Terry Dale9847% games−4.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Danielle Wilder
230W–115L career · 4 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
4.48
5
Heather Remley
298W–155L career · 2 lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
4.42
4.5
Tanya Parise
97W–53L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Elizabeth Copeland
18W–24L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Erin Rankin
102W–102L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
4.13
4
Maureen Sredl
164W–154L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.95
Laura Hiller
14W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Laura Weygandt
269W–127L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Barbara Timinskas
81W–79L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Kristal Nelson
132W–73L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Terry Dale
69W–109L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Mary Money
196W–130L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Emily Culbreth
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
Jane Britt
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.