Teams

VanMeter, Jennifer

2026 HOA Adult 18 & Over Daytime League 2.5W - 5.0 · 4.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-02vs Fendler, KathleenLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Davis / Sarah Taber vs Theresa Nelson / Rebecca Falkner Axelrod2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChan Townsend / Jacque Griffey vs Anna Morrissey / Micah Schloegel2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Schwerdtfeger / Ingrid Brown vs Kandice Thurman / Sally McEntyre7-5, 3-5, 0-1
2025-11-18vs Fangman, AmyLost 12
L#1 DoublesIngrid Brown / Jennifer Hill vs Denise Chiao / Misti Klindt4-6, 5-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Terriquez / Sarah Taber vs Renetta Ramsdell / Alli Gershon6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeslie Addadi / Pamela Kopplin vs Amy Fangman / Mindy Stewart5-7, 5-4, 1-0
2025-11-11vs Sims, NikkiWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Terriquez / Karen Davis vs Michelle Bettis / Stacey Craft6-3, 6-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer VanMeter / Pamela Kopplin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Schwerdtfeger / Jennifer Hill vs Julie Green / Sarah Duethman6-2, 6-3
2025-10-28vs Norman, PhyllisLost 03
L#1 DoublesJacque Griffey / Ingrid Brown vs Phyllis Norman / Betsy Weber4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Davis / Leslie Addadi vs Cynthia Kuhlman / Amy Zogleman4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Schwerdtfeger / Pamela Kopplin vs Paula Spielhagen / Sara Maguire6-7, 2-5
2025-10-21vs Fendler, KathleenWon 21
L#1 DoublesPamela Kopplin / Leslie Addadi vs Theresa Nelson / Carmen Kowalski4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJacque Griffey / Michelle Terriquez vs Rebecca Falkner Axelrod / Elizabeth Roberts6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChan Townsend / Jennifer Hill vs Kathleen Fendler / Amanda Thomley Marsh6-2, 6-4
2025-10-14vs Fangman, AmyLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Davis / Michelle Terriquez vs Misti Klindt / Courtney Krusemark6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPamela Kopplin / Susan Schwerdtfeger vs Romy Carlson / Caprice Stapley4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLeslie Addadi / Jennifer VanMeter vs Jamie Esser / Pritha Prasad6-2, 4-5, 1-0
2025-10-07vs Sims, NikkiWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichelle Terriquez / Ingrid Brown vs Jennifer Stolte / Wesley Bush7-6, 3-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJacque Griffey / Sarah Taber vs Nikki Sims / Sarah Duethman6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJennifer Hill / Chan Townsend vs Jennifer Fallon / Shelley O'Brien6-1, 6-2
2025-09-23vs Norman, PhyllisLost 12
L#1 DoublesJacque Griffey / Chan Townsend vs Jackie Gehrke / Jackie Stahl2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Terriquez / Sarah Taber vs Amy Zogleman / Ashton Sparks5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Davis / Jennifer VanMeter vs Christina Gassen / Phyllis Norman0-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1VanMeter, Jennifer35101432224

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Michelle Terriquez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.12
Karen Davis
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.88
Jacque Griffey
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.85
Sarah Taber
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.84
Ingrid Brown
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.84
Jennifer VanMeter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.82
Pamela Kopplin
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.82
Chan Townsend
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.79
Leslie Addadi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.61
Susan Schwerdtfeger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jennifer Hill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer VanMeter + Sarah Taber9456% games+10.1% vs expected
Pamela Kopplin + Jennifer VanMeter4251% games+4.3% vs expected
Jacque Griffey + Chan Townsend211453% games+3.5% vs expected
Michelle Terriquez + Ingrid Brown8750% games−3.8% vs expected
Jennifer VanMeter + Jacque Griffey2349% games−5.4% vs expected
Pamela Kopplin + Leslie Addadi31441% games−6.5% vs expected
Jennifer VanMeter + Chan Townsend4835% games−21.2% vs expected
Jennifer VanMeter + Karen Davis224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Terriquez
93W–61L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
4.25
Karen Davis
52W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
4.12
Jacque Griffey
125W–79L career · 5 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.88
Sarah Taber
68W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.85
Ingrid Brown
52W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.84
Jennifer VanMeter
133W–108L career · 3 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.84
Pamela Kopplin
33W–60L career · 5 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
3.82
4.5
Chan Townsend
98W–63L career · 4 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
3.82
Leslie Addadi
43W–67L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Susan Schwerdtfeger
73W–65L career · 8 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
Jennifer Hill
27W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.