Teams

RINCONADA PK 18AM4.0C

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-05-22vs RINCONADA PK 18AM4.0FSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCheng Zheng vs Han Song6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesWeijie Yun / Dongning Ma vs Wilson Chen / Chengshu Li6-2, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Haihua Yan
published 4
3.86
Cheng Zheng
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.80
Tajoe Lun
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Manqing Liu
published
3.70
Bin Wan
published 4
3.69
Dongning Ma
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.62
Wei Han
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.56
Guanghua Fan
published 4
3.55
GUOXING LI
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Lin Xu
published
3.41
Yongfa Fan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Lejian Dai
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.36
Lixin Yao
published
3.15
Huican Zhu
published 3.5
Larry Hui
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Mike Zhou
published
Weijie Yun
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Yingzhu Wang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

GUOXING LI + Manqing Liu033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Haihua Yan
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Cheng Zheng
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.86
Tajoe Lun
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.80
Manqing Liu
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Bin Wan
15W–13L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Dongning Ma
12W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Wei Han
11W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Guanghua Fan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
GUOXING LI
1W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Lin Xu
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.44
Yongfa Fan
15W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
Lejian Dai
5W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.38
Lixin Yao
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Huican Zhu
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Larry Hui
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Zhou
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Weijie Yun
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Yingzhu Wang
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.