Teams

KRC:Porowski

2023 NH Tri Level · Men 3.5 1

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-09-14vs ALG:Frank:StoneWon 10
W#1 DoublesChester Porowski / Kevin Starkey vs Jeffrey Degler / Jeffrey Stone6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-09-13vs IND:KickSomeAce:GerhardWon 10
W#1 DoublesRadu Stan / Scott Herstad vs Adam Gerhard / James Murphy6-3, 6-0
2023-08-17vs ALG:Frank:StoneLost 01
L#1 DoublesChester Porowski / Radu Stan vs Jeffrey Stone / Jeffrey Degler3-6, 2-6
2023-08-12vs IND:KickSomeAce:GerhardWon 10
W#1 DoublesChester Porowski / Radu Stan vs Adam Gerhard / Carl Rajotte6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men 3.5 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KRC:Porowski3131327
2ALG:Frank:Stone3131327
3IND:KickSomeAce:Gerhard0404846

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Radu Stan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Chester Porowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Scott Herstad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Starkey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Radu Stan + Chester Porowski5351% games+3.0% vs expected
Scott Herstad + Chester Porowski81048% games−0.4% vs expected
Kevin Starkey + Chester Porowski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Radu Stan
158W–77L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Chester Porowski
104W–90L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Scott Herstad
91W–79L career · 1 line in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Kevin Starkey
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.