Teams

WS Rodrigues

2025 Alachua Adult 18 & Over Winter Mixed 2.5 · 2.5 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 2.67 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-19vs DB MearnsLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlex Andueza / Emilee Cato vs Fritz Gerling / Jazmyn Broxton0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPedro Rodrigues / Tina O'Shea vs Martin Noguera / Gabriela Patino3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Jewell / Isabel Barry vs Corey Mearns / Mary Butterworth6-4, 6-2
2025-03-02vs DB MearnsWon 21
L#1 DoublesGonzalo Suarez / Isabel Zadezensky vs Jazmyn Broxton / Martin Noguera3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesIsabel Barry / Alex Andueza vs Mary Wilson / Fritz Gerling6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesEmilee Cato / Ryan Wilder vs George Atohi / Gabriela Patino6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-21vs DB MearnsLost 12
L#1 DoublesIsabel Zadezensky / Evan Wilder vs Jazmyn Broxton / Martin Noguera6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesIsabel Barry / David Jewell vs Mary Butterworth / Anthony Gonzalez3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesEmilee Cato / Zach Randall vs Mary Wilson / Fritz Gerling6-4, 6-4
2025-02-17vs DB MearnsWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlex Andueza / Isabel Zadezensky vs Jazmyn Broxton / Martin Noguera6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPedro Rodrigues / Isabel Barry vs Gabriela Patino / George Atohi6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGonzalo Suarez / Emilee Cato vs Fritz Gerling / Mary Wilson7-6, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
David Jewell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.88
Zach Randall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Alex Andueza
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Isabel Zadezensky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.41
Emilee Cato
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Evan Wilder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Isabel Barry
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.21
Leandra Combass
published
Ryan Wilder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tina O'Shea
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
David Jewell
4W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.01
Zach Randall
16W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Alex Andueza
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Isabel Zadezensky
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
2.5
Emilee Cato
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%75%25%
2.41
2.5
Evan Wilder
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Isabel Barry
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leandra Combass
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.21
Ryan Wilder
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tina O'Shea
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.