Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AW4.0A

2026 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-15vs ALMADEN VAC 40AW4.0AWon 20
W#1 SinglesVesna Mardesic vs Jean Welch1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLi Yi / Jin Zhang vs Kathy Keller / Anna Wielosz6-4, 6-3
L#1 DoublesAnh-Vi Dao / Tracy Goepel vs Rachel Banse / Kate B Gillis5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJanel Canepa / Vesna Mardesic vs Julie Dean / Frances Caroline Gardhouse1-6, 4-6
2026-03-06vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AW4.0BWon 10
W#1 SinglesVesna Mardesic vs Katherine Sandell6-2, 7-5
2026-03-01vs LOS GATOS SR 40AW4.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnh-Vi Dao / Sally Kim vs Wendy Riggs / Amy Beth Hansman7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLori Cruz-Spray / Sally Kim vs Rita Sandhu / Maya Grosul6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJulia Peng / Li Yi vs Sunny Wang / Emi Iizuka6-1, 6-2
2026-02-07vs ALMADEN VAC 40AW4.0AWon 20
W#1 DoublesBeste Demirag / Lori Cruz-Spray vs Kristin Perry / Margaret A. Roderick6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Backus / Janel Canepa vs Kathy Keller / Rini Sidartawan-Lie6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAnh-Vi Dao / Sally Kim vs Frances Caroline Gardhouse / Lenka Quinanola3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJanel Canepa / Diane Hudson vs Molly McMahon / Abbie Serrano3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesBeste Demirag / Li Yi vs Amy Clark / Melissa Neal5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesVesna Mardesic vs Kristin Dillehay1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJulia Peng / Li Yi vs Rita Sandhu / Jett Koketsu6-3, 6-2
2026-01-11vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AW4.0BWon 20
W#2 DoublesBeste Demirag / Lori Cruz-Spray vs Rosemary Kent / Heather La France7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJin Zhang / Li Yi vs Hilary Butler / Patama Suvarnarat3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings84 teams · Women's 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GOLD RIVER RC 40AW4.0A18201642316
2DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 40AW4.0A000000
3WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW4.0A09241226252
4BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 40AW4.0A09251130264
5CALIFORNIA TC 40AW4.0A09201636296
6SEASCAPE SC 40AW4.0A09201638300
7WIKIUP R SC 40AW4.0A09191738305
8CARMEL VAC 40AW4.0A09162043314
9FOUNTAINGROVE-AC 40AW4.0A09201643332
10RIO DEL ORO 40AW4.0B09152144343
11PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AW4.0A0963062403
12SUNNYVALE MTC 40AW4.0A01037310212
13RIO DEL ORO 40AW4.0A01035515252
14PLEASANTON 40AW4.0C01034616217
15MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK 40AW4.0A01033717280
16FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 40AW4.0A01033718231
17LA CANTERA RC 40AW4.0A010281227295
18SIERRA SPORT 40AW4.0A010281228284
19MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 40AW4.0A010291129291
20WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW4.0B010271329306
21MARIN CC 40AW4.0A010291129288
22HARBOR PT 40AW4.0A010281229297
23WILLOW PASS PK 40AW4.0A010291130291
24BROADSTONE RC 40AW4.0B010271331337
25MILLS COLLEGE 40AW4.0A010301031308
26MARIN TC 40AW4.0A010261433320
27SCOTT VALLEY 40AW4.0A010271334344
28BAY TREES PK 40AW4.0A010261434312
29BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA 40AW4.0A010261437313
30SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 40AW4.0B010261437331
31GOLDMAN TC 40AW4.0A010261438331
32ROUND HILL CC 40AW4.0A010231739333
33MILL VALLEY 40AW4.0A010231739342
34SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 40AW4.0A010241639351
35BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AW4.0A010241640348
36SHARON HTS CC 40AW4.0A010221840345
37CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 40AW4.0A010221841346
38PLEASANTON 40AW4.0D010231742349
39BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AW4.0B010221843361
40ROLLINGWOOD 40AW4.0A010221843349
41BAY CLUB PL 40AW4.0A010231743353
42REDWOOD HS 40AW4.0A010231744366
43BAY CLUB REDWOOD SHORES 40AW4.0A010221845356
44UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 40AW4.0A010202046379
45RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 40AW4.0A010202046381
46PENINSULA TC 40AW4.0A010192147381
47MORAGA CC 40AW4.0A010202048357
48CUBBERLEY 40AW4.0A010202048364
49MENLO ATHERTON HS 40AW4.0A010192148402
50GOLD RIVER RC 40AW4.0B010202048371
51BAY CLUB ROSS VALLEY 40AW4.0A010182249378
52SLEEPY HOLLOW 40AW4.0A010182250379
53VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS 40AW4.0A010162451384
54PIPER PK 40AW4.0A010182251392
55LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 40AW4.0A010182251355
56BERKELEY TC 40AW4.0A010182251383
57LOS GATOS SR 40AW4.0A010172352382
58WALNUT COUNTRY HOA 40AW4.0A010182252399
59NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40AW4.0A010162454385
60SANTA CLARA TC/SANTA CLARA TENNIS C 40AW4.0A010162454407
61SAN JOSE SR 40AW4.0A010142654372
62PLEASANTON 40AW4.0A010172354398
63TIBURON PEN C 40AW4.0A010162454390
64WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW4.0C010152555411
65CUPERTINO TC/CUPERTINO SC 40AW4.0B010142655410
66FREMONT TC 40AW4.0A010142656401
67ROLLING HILLS 40AW4.0A010152556387
68CHABOT CANYON 40AW4.0A010142656402
69BRAMHALL PK 40AW4.0A010152557397
70STANFORD-CRA 40AW4.0A010142657394
71COLONY CLUB 40AW4.0A010152557418
72PLEASANTON 40AW4.0B010142657406
73ALMADEN VAC 40AW4.0A010132758400
74HOPKINS PK 40AW4.0A010122862444
75SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK 40AW4.0A010112963436
76BOYLE PK 40AW4.0A01093164408
77GALVIN PK 40AW4.0A01093165431
78ROSEVILLE LIFE TIME 40AW4.0A01093165424
79FIG GARDEN 40AW4.0A010103066440
80DIABLO CC 40AW4.0A01093166433
81RAFAEL RC 40AW4.0A01083267458
82CUPERTINO TC/CUPERTINO SC 40AW4.0A01073367439
83BROADSTONE RC 40AW4.0A01083268442
84BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 40AW4.0B01053572449

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Silvana Gold
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published
3.85
Michelle Nicholson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.83
Julia Peng
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.83
Kimi Sato
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.77
Beste Demirag
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Lori Cruz-Spray
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.77
Lisa Backus
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
3.73
Anh-Vi Dao
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Sandra Morizawa
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
3.68
Li Yi
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.66
Tracy Goepel
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
3.62
Dorien Africa
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.59
Diane Hudson
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.57
Janel Canepa
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Sally Kim
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Vesna Mardesic
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.47
Julie Blaha
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Christine Fronczak
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
3.16
Jin Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Cruz-Spray + Beste Demirag4260% games+5.3% vs expected
Julia Peng + Li Yi4259% games+4.9% vs expected
Silvana Gold + Kimi Sato3360% games+3.4% vs expected
Silvana Gold + Lisa Backus6159% games+1.6% vs expected
Anh-Vi Dao + Sally Kim2352% gamesnot enough data
Lori Cruz-Spray + Lisa Backus303 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Backus + Kimi Sato213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Silvana Gold
45W–23L career · 16 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
Michelle Nicholson
45W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.85
Julia Peng
22W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.83
Kimi Sato
22W–23L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Beste Demirag
10W–9L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Lori Cruz-Spray
21W–13L career · 10 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Lisa Backus
57W–20L career · 13 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Anh-Vi Dao
9W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Sandra Morizawa
23W–29L career · 11 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Li Yi
13W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Tracy Goepel
16W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.66
Dorien Africa
14W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Diane Hudson
10W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
Janel Canepa
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.57
Sally Kim
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Vesna Mardesic
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
Julie Blaha
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.47
3.5
Christine Fronczak
50W–39L career · 13 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Jin Zhang
14W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.