Teams

SD LLW 4.0 Balboa TC/ Barraquio

2023 SoCal Fall Doubles SD- WE · SD Men 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.19 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-11-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesCharles Hamori / Eric Bowers vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-11-26vs SD 4.0 Lake Murray TC/ HillWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Carter / Charles Hamori vs M Edelson / Jess Zlotnik6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJoseph Barraquio / Jeff Harris vs Matt George / Eyal Oren6-0, 7-6
2023-11-12vs SD 4.0 La Jolla TC/ WattonWon 10
W#3 DoublesJoseph Barraquio / Adam Hoyt vs Jacob Watton / Maxwell Bosse6-2, 6-2
2023-11-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesJoseph Barraquio / Adan Provencio vs Anthony Zelaya / Andrew Nguyen6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJoseph Barraquio / Jamie Armstrong vs Lucas Heilman / Ben Hogan7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAndre Archilla / Sakda Kethdy vs Teppei Karasawa / James Sison7-5, 7-6
2023-10-08vs SD 4.0 SDTRC/ ChannickLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoseph Barraquio / Sakda Kethdy vs Ryan Adams / Marc Channick3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 DoublesAdam Hoyt / Sakda Kethdy vs Pietro Martinez / Luke Chang5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAndrew Gilcrest / Charles Hamori vs Tyler Haire / Nicholas Rodrigues4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adam Hoyt
published 4.5
4.14
Francisco Loayza
published 4.5
4.03
Joseph Barraquio
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
3.97
Eric Bowers
published 4
3.86
Andrew Gilcrest
published 4
3.81
Jeff Lin
published
3.79
Sakda Kethdy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.75
Charles Hamori
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Erwin Guzman
published 4
Jeff Harris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sakda Kethdy + Joseph Barraquio6746% games−8.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Adam Hoyt
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Francisco Loayza
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Joseph Barraquio
100W–51L career · 7 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
4.03
4
Eric Bowers
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Andrew Gilcrest
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.86
Jeff Lin
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Sakda Kethdy
75W–55L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Charles Hamori
132W–64L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Erwin Guzman
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Jeff Harris
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.