Teams

HILLS/Xue

2026 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men Adult 40 & over

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesDavid Goodlow / Jeff Pebenito vs Randall Smith / Mark Weissman6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRajashekar Anne / Michael Paolicelli vs Robert Philbin / Britt Wehrman6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNaveen Kumar Ramakrishna / Gary McClendon vs James Watling / Zelko Kirincich2-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesMichael Garrison / Edward Snyder vs Frank Pruse Jr / Frank Pruse Iii6-2, 6-3
2026-05-30vs Buckhorn/ RasmussenLost 12
L#1 DoublesRajashekar Anne / Jeff Pebenito vs Maurice Steenland / Don Valenti4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGary McClendon / Warren Snyder vs Shawn Rasmussen / Matthew Kovalick1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Paolicelli / Michael Garrison vs Bill Almond / Byron Beasley6-2, 7-5
2026-05-18vs Hunters Green CC/ L. MarinezWon 10
W#2 DoublesSherry Peterson / Wei Xue vs Deborah Brown / Olga Rodriguez6-1, 6-2
2026-05-11vs Avilia Golf & CC / CyprianoWon 10
W#1 DoublesSherry Peterson / Wei Xue vs Joy Themides / Stacey Lee7-5, 6-2
W#1 DoublesRajashekar Anne / Michael Paolicelli vs Randall Smith / Steven Sutton6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBonifacio Gutierrez / Jeff Pebenito vs Diego Perez / Mark Weissman4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Garrison / Edward Snyder vs Robert Philbin / Britt Wehrman6-1, 6-4
W#4 DoublesGary McClendon / Ram Bishnoi vs James Watling / Robin Hsu5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2026-05-02vs Buckhorn/ RasmussenWon 32
W#1 DoublesDavid Goodlow / Jeff Pebenito vs Daniel Roller Nogueira / Rodrigo Vivi6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesRandall Bartus vs Daniel Espinoza2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBonifacio Gutierrez / Michael Paolicelli vs Matthew Kovalick / Shawn Rasmussen1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Garrison / Edward Snyder vs Maurice Steenland / Byron Beasley6-1, 6-1
W#4 DoublesGary McClendon / Warren Snyder vs Bill Almond / Jordan Murray6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-04-27vs HCC Tennis / FlitmanLost 01
L#4 DoublesWei Xue / Donna Petress-Miller vs Laura Bleacher / Tricia Novak1-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesJeff Pebenito / Randall Bartus vs Diego Perez / Mark Weissman5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBonifacio Gutierrez / Ram Bishnoi vs Gregg Sturdevant / Britt Wehrman5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Paolicelli / Michael Garrison vs Brian Lenaghan / Les Lettiero6-2, 6-3
L#4 DoublesEdward Snyder / Warren Snyder vs Robin Hsu / Zelko Kirincich5-7, 4-6
2026-04-11vs Buckhorn/ RasmussenWon 31
W#1 DoublesDavid Goodlow / Michael Paolicelli vs Shawn Rasmussen / Matthew Kovalick6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesRandall Bartus vs Daniel Espinoza3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBonifacio Gutierrez / Ram Bishnoi vs Maurice Steenland / Rodrigo Vivi7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJeff Pebenito / Ken Page vs Bill Almond / Colin Clark6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men Adult 40 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
David Goodlow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.02
Johnny Moreno
published
3.00
Wei Xue
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Bonifacio Gutierrez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Edward Snyder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Jeff Pebenito
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.75
Ram Bishnoi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
2.74
Michael Paolicelli
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Randall Bartus
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Gary McClendon
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.55
Michael Garrison
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
2.54
Warren Snyder
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Garrison + Michael Paolicelli3256% games+13.2% vs expected
Edward Snyder + Michael Garrison303 matchesnot enough data
Edward Snyder + Warren Snyder213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
David Goodlow
12W–2L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
Johnny Moreno
8W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Wei Xue
22W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.00
3
Bonifacio Gutierrez
11W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Edward Snyder
6W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.83
Jeff Pebenito
9W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
Ram Bishnoi
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Michael Paolicelli
6W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
Randall Bartus
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Gary McClendon
2W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
Michael Garrison
52W–58L career · 5 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.55
Warren Snyder
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.