Teams

Refunds

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · Refunds

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Refunds have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Josh Goldblatt
published 4.5
3.88
Warren Stanton
published
3.86
Taylor Dries
published
3.49
Mary Parker
published
3.47
Kristin Bergeson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.43
Sarah Villareal
published
3.13
Jigisha Thaker
published
3.10
Jane Hadley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Elaine Eisenbaum
published 3
2.56
Bert Wilder
published
Sherese Smith
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Josh Goldblatt
150W–75L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
Warren Stanton
57W–37L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
Taylor Dries
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.86
Mary Parker
8W–19L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Kristin Bergeson
97W–78L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.47
Sarah Villareal
38W–27L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
3.43
Jigisha Thaker
64W–65L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Jane Hadley
77W–79L career · 6 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Elaine Eisenbaum
17W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Catherine Wigington
13W–33L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
2.56
Bert Wilder
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sherese Smith
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.