Teams

NTC - Swindell

2025 CSRATA Southern Combo 18 & Over - Summer · Women 6.5 Combo

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-14vs Fleming - DavidsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlexis Shaefer / Mallory Metts vs Breonna Moore / AnnieB Brown2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCathy Sirmans / Wendy Wiggins vs Danielle Davidson / Laraine Fraijo6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKatherine Granillo / Melisa DeAngel vs Beth Esposito / Teresa Kemp7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-08vs RVW - FralickLost 12
L#1 DoublesLyndi Baldy / Cathy Sirmans vs Karen Fralick / Ashley Johnson5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKatherine Granillo / Sheri Brackett vs Laurel Landon / Jenni Scott6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJudith Sexton / Alexis Shaefer vs Jessica Litavec / Ellie Dashiell1-6, 1-6
2025-05-31vs Springlakes - AddymanLost 12
L#1 DoublesDenise Vaughn / Sheri Brackett vs Jennifer Olmstead / Sandra de Leon0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKatherine Granillo / Rita Bell vs Mary Ellen Earwood / Laraine Beasley1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesWendy Wiggins / Mallory Metts vs Tracie Addyman / Nora Rader6-2, 6-3
2025-05-22vs CSRATA/Leslie SpragueLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Mercier / Wendy Wiggins vs Lun Cai / Karen Ard5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLyndi Baldy / Cathy Sirmans vs Mary Senn / Talita Bernardi3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRita Bell / Katherine Granillo vs Leslie Sprague / Tanya Gibbons2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-03vs Odell Weeks - GregoryLost 03
L#1 DoublesLyndi Baldy / Sheri Brackett vs Kristen Galvan / Susie Kneece2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWendy Wiggins / Rita Bell vs Emily Hanna / Beth Shedd0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKristen Williams / Melisa DeAngel vs Agnes Hobson / Jill Thomas1-6, 1-6
2025-04-26vs RVW - ClarkWon 21
L#1 DoublesJudith Sexton / Mallory Metts vs Dara Dixon / Jeanette Pellot3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLyndi Baldy / Rowena Aase vs Kristina Topp / Christiana Caswell6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelisa DeAngel / Kelly Mercier vs Erika Pracht / Sharonne Calvin6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 Combo have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Kelly Mercier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Denise Vaughn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Cathy Sirmans
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Katherine Granillo
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
3.02
Rowena Aase
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Lyndi Baldy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Judith Sexton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Wendy Wiggins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
Alexis Shaefer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Rita Bell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Sheri Brackett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.46
Melisa DeAngel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mallory Metts
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Wiggins + Rita Bell10455% games+3.4% vs expected
Sheri Brackett + Rita Bell2347% games+0.8% vs expected
Lyndi Baldy + Sheri Brackett112048% games−0.2% vs expected
Lyndi Baldy + Judith Sexton1541% games−0.8% vs expected
Sheri Brackett + Judith Sexton2539% games−5.0% vs expected
Wendy Wiggins + Melisa DeAngel1431% games−7.3% vs expected
Lyndi Baldy + Melisa DeAngel044 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Wiggins + Judith Sexton224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Mercier
78W–32L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.61
3.5
Denise Vaughn
32W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Cathy Sirmans
37W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
Katherine Granillo
15W–36L career · 9 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Rowena Aase
14W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Lyndi Baldy
22W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.83
Judith Sexton
21W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
Wendy Wiggins
31W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Alexis Shaefer
37W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Rita Bell
20W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.78
Sheri Brackett
27W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.78
Melisa DeAngel
12W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
Mallory Metts
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.