Teams

Sarasota/Mihm/55&Over8.0M

2024 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter Weekday · 8.0 M Thursday

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-04-04Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGustavo Risquez / Peter Laughlin vs Chris New / Vivek Kumar3-6, 6-7
2024-03-14vs Laurel Oak RosenbergLost 01
L#1 DoublesPeter Laughlin / Jim Fiumefreddo vs Chris New / Jim Capazola1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-03-08vs Laurel Oak RosenbergWon 10
W#2 DoublesPeter Laughlin / Gregory Childers vs Chris Canfield / Kenneth Schwartz6-2, 6-4
2024-02-29vs Laurel Oak RosenbergLost 01
L#2 DoublesGustavo Risquez / Peter Laughlin vs David Rosenberg / Vivek Kumar3-6, 5-7
2024-02-22vs Laurel Oak RosenbergWon 10
W#2 DoublesPeter Laughlin / William Rhodes vs Jim Capazola / Kenneth Schwartz6-2, 6-3
2024-02-15vs Laurel Oak RosenbergWon 10
W#2 DoublesGustavo Risquez / Peter Laughlin vs Kevin Spudic / Kenneth Schwartz7-5, 6-4
2024-02-08vs Laurel Oak RosenbergWon 10
W#1 DoublesPeter Laughlin / Gregory Childers vs David Rosenberg / Chris New7-6, 6-2
2024-02-01vs Laurel Oak RosenbergLost 02
L#2 DoublesWilliam Rhodes / Gustavo Risquez vs David Saxe / Jim Capazola7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTim Mihm / Peter Laughlin vs David Rosenberg / Chris New6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-01-25vs Laurel Oak RosenbergWon 10
W#1 DoublesGustavo Risquez / Gregory Childers vs Jim Capazola / Vivek Kumar6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 M Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jim Fiumefreddo
published
3.81
Gustavo Risquez
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
Kip Schoonover
published
3.73
Peter Laughlin
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
RON NOURSE
published
3.56
Nader Massoumi
published
Gregory Childers
published
Phillip Mihm
published
Steven Paley
published
Tim Mihm
published
William Rhodes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Laughlin + Gustavo Risquez2450% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jim Fiumefreddo
9W–0L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Gustavo Risquez
206W–174L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.81
Kip Schoonover
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Peter Laughlin
76W–45L career · 8 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.73
RON NOURSE
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
Nader Massoumi
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.56
Gregory Childers
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Phillip Mihm
12W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Paley
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim Mihm
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
William Rhodes
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.