Teams

VSchaeffer/MJuell (OPRC)

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 7.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.64 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-29vs BHart (Palisades)Won 30
W#1 DoublesKatrina Schellhorn / Laura Clancy vs Jenny Smith / Paula Olive6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Roberts / Keiran Llaneza vs Kelli Crane / Rene Roulier6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Danesis / Diane Gerbereux vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-22vs WLutgring (BCC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Bundrick / Jennifer Danesis vs Jennifer Ison / Rachael Schuler6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDiane Gerbereux / Laura Irick vs Wendy Lutgring / Irene Rapaglia0-6, 2-6
2025-09-15vs AKinder (Weddington Chase)Won 20
W#2 DoublesVeronica Schaeffer / Josey Waleski vs Monica Turner / Laurie Rosser6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDiane Gerbereux / Katrina Schellhorn vs Rae Lynn Pope / Blair Diamond6-0, 6-1
2025-09-08vs KMassaro (WSRC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesLaura Brown / Keiran Llaneza vs Margaret Dobeck / Emily Brandon6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJosey Waleski / Laura Irick vs Lindsey Barnes / Julie Smallwood3-6, 3-6
2025-09-01vs SSmulktis/DConrad (Jeff Adams)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Bundrick / Katie Haywood vs Mallory Miller / Caroline Withers5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Clancy / Keiran Llaneza vs Danielle Conrad / Sarah Smulktis6-7, 1-6
2025-08-25vs DToomey/ASauls (OPRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Danesis / Jennifer Roberts vs Sara Lineberger / Anne Sauls4-6, 4-6
2025-08-18vs MPaterson (Queens)Won 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Bundrick / Katie Haywood vs Maureen Paterson / Kimberly Fore6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Danesis / Laura Clancy vs Barbara Moysaenko / Kelly Treble5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Jennifer Roberts
published
3.73
Erin Lentz
published
3.73
Amy Bundrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Katie Haywood
published
3.71
Diane Gerbereux
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Laura Clancy
published
3.67
Veronica Schaeffer
published
3.48
Maren Juell
published
3.42
Laura Irick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Jennifer Danesis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Keiran Llaneza
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Josey Waleski
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
Katrina Schellhorn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Georgia Buck
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Danesis + Keiran Llaneza9458% games+6.7% vs expected
Laura Irick + Josey Waleski8456% games−1.4% vs expected
Jennifer Danesis + Josey Waleski7357% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Roberts
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Erin Lentz
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Amy Bundrick
28W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.73
Katie Haywood
15W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.72
4
Diane Gerbereux
11W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Laura Clancy
28W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.69
Veronica Schaeffer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Maren Juell
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Laura Irick
41W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Jennifer Danesis
65W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Keiran Llaneza
103W–59L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Josey Waleski
67W–62L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Katrina Schellhorn
22W–13L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Georgia Buck
10W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.