Teams

MSIL A18&O 3.0W Blackledge-Champaign

2025 MSIL Adult 18 & Over -MSIL East League · East MSIL A18 & O 3.0W

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-16vs MSIL/Hartman18&O3.0WLost 05
L#1 DoublesDebra Carlson / Jeongmin Kim vs Emily Hurth / Leslie Hartman1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnna Blackledge vs Stephanie Tresslar0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCandy Leti / Amanda Ogden vs Erin Tracy / Mathea Holder2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren MacHula / Susan Toalson vs Lynn Timmons / Beth Arndt3-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesJoan Tousey / Helen Coleman vs Janelle Lunney / Katy Leman5-7, 3-6
2025-06-09vs MSIL/Hartman18&O3.0WLost 23
W#1 DoublesDebra Carlson / Laura Van Buer vs Emily Hurth / Erin Tracy7-6, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKym Man vs Mathea Holder6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJeongmin Kim / Karen MacHula vs Stephanie Tresslar / Leslie Hartman2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmanda Ogden / Candy Leti vs Janelle Lunney / Diana Shekhed3-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesJoan Tousey / Susan Toalson vs Tamsyn Gilbert / Beth Arndt4-6, 5-7
2025-06-02vs MSIL/Hartman18&O3.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesDebra Carlson / Kym Man vs Lynn Timmons / Mathea Holder2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJeongmin Kim / Laura Van Buer vs Janelle Lunney / Katy Leman6-1, 6-4
W#4 DoublesHelen Coleman / Anna Blackledge vs Colleen Murphy / Tamsyn Gilbert7-5, 6-2
2025-05-19vs MSIL/Hartman18&O3.0WLost 14
W#1 DoublesKym Man / Debra Carlson vs Janelle Lunney / Katy Leman6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLaura Van Buer vs Diana Shekhed6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBetina Basile / Amanda Ogden vs Stephanie Tresslar / Erin Tracy0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCandy Leti / Susan Toalson vs Emily Hurth / Beth Arndt2-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesJoan Tousey / Helen Coleman vs Whitney Hartman / Leslie Hartman2-6, 3-6
2025-05-12vs MSIL/Hartman18&O3.0WLost 23
L#1 DoublesDebra Carlson / Candy Leti vs Stephanie Tresslar / Katy Leman2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKym Man vs Emily Hurth6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBetina Basile / Jeongmin Kim vs Erin Tracy / Whitney Hartman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren MacHula / Laura Van Buer vs Mathea Holder / Beth Arndt4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#4 DoublesHelen Coleman / Joan Tousey vs Colleen Murphy / Diana Shekhed1-6, 4-6
2025-05-05vs MSIL/Hartman18&O3.0WLost 23
L#1 DoublesAmanda Ogden / Betina Basile vs Stephanie Tresslar / Emily Hurth1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKym Man vs Janelle Lunney6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAnna Blackledge / Candy Leti vs Leslie Hartman / Diana Shekhed0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHelen Coleman / Joan Tousey vs Erin Tracy / Tamsyn Gilbert2-6, 1-6
W#4 DoublesJeongmin Kim / Susan Toalson vs Beth Arndt / Colleen Murphy6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for East MSIL A18 & O 3.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Laura Van Buer
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.17
Kym Man
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.65
Betina Basile
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Debra Carlson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Anna Blackledge
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.40
Joan Tousey
usually #4 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.36
Candy Leti
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.23
Amanda Ogden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Helen Coleman
usually #4 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Karen MacHula
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Toalson
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Tousey + Helen Coleman044 matchesnot enough data
Susan Toalson + Joan Tousey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Van Buer
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Kym Man
27W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.17
3
Betina Basile
20W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.65
3
Debra Carlson
3W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
3
Anna Blackledge
3W–14L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.42
Joan Tousey
8W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.40
3
Candy Leti
0W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.36
2.5
Amanda Ogden
1W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
Helen Coleman
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen MacHula
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Toalson
2W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.