Teams

GJTC SERB

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - WS · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - WS

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-17vs GJTC JJOLLEYLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Erb / Carol Serrano vs Sarah Butterfield / Dana Lee Dunn1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSofia Treider / Alyssa Rittenhouse vs Jeena Jolley / Val Kennedy3-6, 2-6
2026-08-10vs GJTC KHUGHESWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Erb / Carol Serrano vs Ramona McKenzie / Karin Cook6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesStacie Dix vs Lisa Westhoff6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJaymie Redfern / Tara Marshall vs Keely Eberly / Lauren Bleil4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-03vs GJTC SREINERLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Erb / Cynthia Mill vs Peggy Wrich / Amanda Grimsley6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSofia Treider vs Tinarivo Ranivomboahangy0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Eccles / Alyssa Rittenhouse vs Lauren Lewis / Sharon Reiner2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - WS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GJTC SREINER2051331
2GJTC JJOLLEY2051431
3GJTC SERB1133750

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Carol Serrano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Cynthia Mill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Stacie Dix
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Alyssa Rittenhouse
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Jaymie Redfern
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Tara Marshall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Susan Erb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Michelle Eccles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Elise Prinster
published
Sofia Treider
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Erb + Carol Serrano6348% games−3.7% vs expected
Cynthia Mill + Jaymie Redfern14757% games−6.3% vs expected
Cynthia Mill + Carol Serrano314 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Eccles + Susan Erb044 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Mill + Michelle Eccles123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Serrano
63W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Cynthia Mill
90W–65L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
Stacie Dix
23W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Alyssa Rittenhouse
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Jaymie Redfern
75W–47L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Tara Marshall
8W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Susan Erb
27W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Michelle Eccles
35W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.05
Elise Prinster
4W–15L career · no lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.88
Sofia Treider
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.