Teams

4 ACAC Davis

2023 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.58 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-08Won 20
W#1 SinglesDina Weddle vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAlicia Zatcoff / Barbara Kasten vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-24vs 2 ACAC NeumannWon 10
W#1 SinglesNatalie Lewis vs Betsy Civilette0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-06-17vs 11 Salisbury Brunner-BrownWon 20
W#1 SinglesNatalie Lewis vs Laney Hyatt6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJean Davis / Dina Weddle vs Tara Hudson / Julie Nobles6-4, 6-1
2023-06-02vs 8 ACAC Naylor/HoeferWon 20
W#1 SinglesDina Weddle vs Anne Saunier6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCarol Pfeiffer / Barbara Kasten vs Carol Hoefer / Neki Grant4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-18vs 3 ACAC Kellner/KrebsWon 20
W#1 SinglesNatalie Lewis vs Teresa McClellan6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBarbara Kasten / Lisa Smithson vs Linda Colbert / Nancy Jamer7-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Dina Weddle
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Grace Kim
published
3.37
Allison Krumpe
published 3.5
3.30
Lisa Smithson
published
3.28
Stacy McLeod
published
3.27
Yasmin Lutterbie
published
3.27
Barbara Kasten
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Jean Davis
published
3.16
Dawn Kelsey
published 3.5
3.14
Carol Pfeiffer
published 3.5
3.13
Natalie Lewis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Erika King
published
3.08
Joanne Wilson
published
3.03
3.02
Lisa Loudermilk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Kelsey + Yasmin Lutterbie213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dina Weddle
148W–60L career · 3 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Grace Kim
22W–26L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Allison Krumpe
13W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
Lisa Smithson
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
Stacy McLeod
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Yasmin Lutterbie
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Barbara Kasten
156W–66L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Jean Davis
24W–22L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Dawn Kelsey
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Carol Pfeiffer
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Natalie Lewis
142W–127L career · 3 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
Erika King
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Joanne Wilson
15W–15L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
Pamela Christian Wilson
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
Lisa Loudermilk
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.