Teams

HCC Blankley (mixed)

2023 Richmond Tri-Level Mixed 18 & Over · Richmond Tri-Level Mixed 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-11-02vs MAC HambrickLost 01
L#1 DoublesAMY LINES / Kelby Morgan vs Matthew Morris / Katherine McDowell4-6, 6-7
2023-10-26vs Westwood HauseLost 01
L#1 DoublesAMY LINES / Stephen Faraci vs Leslie Altaffer / Dutch Jones6-7, 0-6
2023-10-12vs Avalon MizrachLost 01
L#1 DoublesAMY LINES / William Wise vs Lesley Terminella / Jason Fenchuk3-6, 4-6
2023-10-05vs Avalon Ghita (mixed)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAMY LINES / Mark Westman vs Connie Jervey / Alex Neuwelt1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level Mixed 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
AMY LINES
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Kathleen Crotty
published
3.62
Kelby Morgan
published
3.49
Beth Stinson
published 3.5
3.43
Scott Frazier
published
3.11
William Wise
published
3.01
Kirsten Knull
published
3.00
Gray Booker
published
2.98
Stacey Haug
published
2.93
Ted Jurkuta
published
2.83
David Blankley
published 3
2.58
Samuel Adams
published
2.57
Elizabeth Jurkuta
published
Lesley Alouf
published
Mark Westman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Jurkuta + Ted Jurkuta0534% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Crotty + David Blankley4156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
AMY LINES
219W–86L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.96
Kathleen Crotty
19W–11L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
Kelby Morgan
10W–15L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Beth Stinson
27W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Scott Frazier
15W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43
William Wise
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
Kirsten Knull
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
Gray Booker
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.00
Stacey Haug
20W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
Ted Jurkuta
18W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
David Blankley
19W–27L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Samuel Adams
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
2.58
Elizabeth Jurkuta
5W–17L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
2.57
Lesley Alouf
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Westman
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.